SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Anne Lamb who wrote (27092)11/17/1997 10:48:00 AM
From: Proton  Respond to of 35569
 
Re: Globe-Mail/Bloomberg Reporting

Do you know what time those stories were released, Anne?

doubt we will see a short squeeze

You're right, but we may already be seeing a short covering rally. At 3 5/8, we've retraced 30% of today's downdraft. To the Fibonacci-number followers, 38.2%, 50%, and 61.8% are all important levels to watch. I find these numbers interesting, but not always tradable. :-)




To: Anne Lamb who wrote (27092)11/17/1997 10:49:00 AM
From: Donald Watson, Jr.  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 35569
 
Ann they can Bite Me. Did you read Struthers report? The grades that Batemen found were consistent with Aurics. (The samples that Batemen took were close to that of Aurics and they came out with the same numbers ...or close" To me that means if Batemen decided to twin Aurics areas where we got the good numbers (This is all Random) WE WOULD GET THE SAME RESULTS... OR NEAR. Also Batemens only been there a couple months. Give them some time. This is the Best news YET!!!! Well if we wnat to waste more time and money lets have Batemn twin Aurics holes and report those high grades, will that make us feel better (Yea maybe a little) or lets have them do that backlog of samples and get an accurate picture. Or do your own math and split Aurics and Batemens numbers. Those numbers sound GREAT TO ME.

Mr. Struthers although you did not have a chance to comment on my post to you yesterday regarding Auric and Batemen, Id say I was pretty close.. YOUR KUNG FU IS STILL THE BEST

Your Friend,

Don Watson



To: Anne Lamb who wrote (27092)11/17/1997 10:56:00 AM
From: Bob Pressler  Respond to of 35569
 
3 5/8 X 3 23/32 573k(edit 3 9/16 X 3 19/32)