Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: average joe who wrote (34149)	6/29/2011 8:58:22 AM
From: Maurice Winn	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36917

Funny that the self-dealing bludging universities are promoting ignorance and superstition: <The open letter calls on Australia's Notre Dame University to cancel a lecture by Monckton Thursday, saying he stood for "the kind of ignorance and superstition that universities have a duty to counter". > Ignorance - "I will destroy the data rather than allow it to be exposed to the light of day". "They only want the data to prove the sacred worshipful theories are wrong". Superstition - "Gaia is in balance, loves us, but we have sinned. We must wear sackcloth and hair shirts to seek atonement". "Nature is bliss and wants only for all to live in harmony, if only we evil-doing humans would let it." Faulty superstitious premises are the foundation of Global Warming and fake science is the cash flow defender of self-dealing bludgers. Popper, Feynman, Einstein = scientists Mann, Jones, Briffa = well, they don't really compare do they? Popper - falsifiability. Jones - I will destroy the data. Einstein - it takes only one scientist to prove me wrong, it doesn't matter how many agree. Mann - we have consensus, the vote is in, we won the election... hahaha... yes Mr Mann Made Warming. Feynman - seek all the data and do not exclude data. "Hide the decline" is the way to handle data in Global Warming theory. Mqurice