To: i-node who wrote (617734 ) 6/29/2011 3:08:56 PM From: tejek Respond to of 1578969 There's never any evidence until after the fact.....like with Love Canal and cigarettes. These kind of claims have been made since the country was been founded only to be overturened by reality. Oh. So, what happened to liberals being all about the science? Love Canal happened at a time when nobody knew, LITERALLY, the effects of the chemicals that were dumped there. It was three or four decades LATER that the facts came out. Nobody ever considered the possibility that these chemicals were harmful, and nobody gave any consideration to the possibility they could end up contaminating anything. The fracking industry has been under the microscope with extensive testing for several years, and NO EVIDENCE OF CONTAMINATION has turned up yet. Basically, you got nothing. Really? I have nothing? Hooker Chemical had sold the site to the Niagara Falls School Board in 1953 for $1, with a deed explicitly detailing the presence of the waste,[1] and including a liability limitation clause about the contamination. The construction efforts of housing development, combined with particularly heavy rainstorms, released the chemical waste, leading to a public health emergency and an urban planning scandal. Hooker Chemical was found to be negligent in their disposal of waste, though not reckless in the sale of the land, in what became a test case for liability clauses. The dumpsite was discovered and investigated by the local newspaper, the Niagara Falls Gazette, from 1976 through the evacuation in 1978. Potential health problems were first raised by reporter Michael H. Brown in July 1978. en.wikipedia.org To Hooker's credit, they resisted selling the land because they knew how toxic the chemicals were and the danger they posed to the ecology. As to cigarettes, the story was entirely different. You're talking about a highly addictive substance where its manufacturers were part of the fabric of the American economy since the earliest days of the country. They had plenty of money and CONTROLLED the science on the subject, which made it easy to mislead the public -- and the addictive nature of the substance made it astoundingly difficult to get people to stop using it. Thanks for making my point. Rarely can corps. be trusted in telling the truth esp when they are dealing with chemicals that are dangerous to the ecology and humans.We don’t know enough about hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, to judge whether the process will contaminate drinking water supplies, harm the environment, and have harmful effects on human health. This is a damned lie that ignores the science. We DO know the process will not contaminate the drinking water because the drinking water has been tested and re-tested and no evidence of contamination has been found. FURTHERMORE, good sense tells you that chemicals used THOUSANDS OF FEET BELOW THE WATER TABLE are not going to mysteriously gravitate UP to the water table so as to contaminate it. In New York the issue has raised particular concern because part of the Marcellus Shale lies underneath the city’s drinking water supply EXACTLY. God, you people are dumb Not as dumb as the Arkansas residents who work at that chicken plant. Do you ever wonder why Arkansas is so poor?