Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Anne Lamb who wrote (27108)	11/17/1997 11:29:00 AM
From: Donald Watson, Jr.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

Ann and all, would it not have been ideal if IPM in there news release to say in one form or another " It is interesting to note that the limited samples (Due to time constraints and get everone off our ass) from Batemen Matched or were similar to that of Aurics. We expect Batemen given enough time could Match or BEAT Aurics Numbers if they sample the entire grid as Auric" Maybe they could not even use Aurics name (Regarding the Samples signed off)since they would not play with Auric (Pay Me, Rape Me). Please someone tell me if Im wrong? Your Friend, Don Watson