Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (34199)	6/29/2011 4:20:29 PM
From: koan	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 36917

huffingtonpost.com You are so easy. I set you up i.e. I knew where the research was and you walked right into it. PS I have a lot more where that came from. answers.yahoo.com politicalwire.com alternet.org Want more? Now I would expect you to put me on ignore as you cannot defend your positions. Next post.

To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (34199)	6/29/2011 4:24:16 PM
From: koan	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 36917

<<Sez you. The top scientists and their universities don't do that. You just made that up. LOL! you should read the news a little bit more. Everything that i said is well documented.>> Show me the documentation? No it isn't, you made that up to. YOu seem to make lots of stuff up. Who cares, we are talking about the thousands around the world. Always a few bad apples <<those few bad apples are the leaders of the supposed scientific effort to prove AGW.>> Scientists don't have leaders-lol. Oh, and by the way, my son in law is one of those PHD AGW research scientists. Just got tenure. Everyone knows that. It is common knowledge and it was decided in the last century in the largest debate ever between Einstein (who didn't believe it)and the quantum folks who disocvered it. Einstein finally conceded defeat. <<Schrodinger's cat doesn't believe in AGW. or maybe he does, or doesn't or does or doesn't>> I am amazed you know who Schrodinger's cat is. It is true and the reason only 6% of scientists are Republican's and 80% lean democratic. Dems believe in science like evolution and the R's not so much. PS most scientists are liberal as well. I'd love to see your source for those assertions. (in other words, I'm calling B.S.)