Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tim Hall who wrote (27127)	11/17/1997 12:13:00 PM
From: Bob Jagow	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

Goly gee, Tim, pretty scary that " the announcement said [nothing] about Bateman confirmation of [the Bateman] fire assay"

To: Tim Hall who wrote (27127)	11/17/1997 12:58:00 PM
From: Claude Cormier	Respond to of 35569

<< Claude, I might be wrong, but I don't believe that the announcement said anything about Bateman confirmation of fire assay. I believe the fire assay samples are IPM's own samples which they did COC and security on and then sent to a lab which was able to do fire assay. We just don't know which lab. >> That is the way I read the PR as well. But in the FAQ posted on their website IPM confirms that one of the samples (181T I think) has followed COC by Bateman and was assayed by that lab.