Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Obama - Clinton Disaster -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Follies who wrote (52429)	7/7/2011 1:27:35 PM
From: stock bull	1 Recommendation Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 103300

Thanks for your response. My question addressed the issue of demand. If Apple didn't see any demand for an iCar, why would they build a factory? If Apple saw a consumer demand, then they might go ahead with their plans and hope the consumers will buy their Car. However, when consumers don't have the ability to buy new iCars, and are busy paying off debt, building a saving account, and fighting to keep their homes, why would Apple build a plant? Given that Apple's tax rate were cut to zero, what's the sense of building a plant if they can't sell the iCars? Of course, the tax rates might influence whether the plant is build in the U.S. or offshore. Thus, this would impact the U.S. job's picture. But, that's not part of my original question. By the way, my original message suggested cutting the middle and lower wage earners taxes is one way to help create demand. Stock Bull