To: Sea Otter who wrote (34562 ) 7/8/2011 1:06:49 AM From: Maurice Winn 1 Recommendation Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 36921 My objections are not political nor emotional. <in favor of the GW anthropic theory - even if some members of the public want to deny it due to various political or emotional objections. > For a start, I observe reality and note that the predicted changes have not happened. That's the absolute test of science. Does reality match prediction? If not, the theory is bung. No if's buts or maybes. But my theory conflicts with the GW theory. My theory has reglaciation, or at least serious cold, [which has already started, as predicted by me in October 2008] starting 2020. Note 2020 foresight. The GW people operate on a false premise. Just as a building depends on having good foundations, theories depend on reliable founding premises. The founding premise of GW is false. Another part of my theory is that CO2 is a good thing. Plants love it and it reduces irrigation requirements. The GW theory assumes any change is bad. Then there are the dishonesty, lies, crimes, self-dealing money grubbing, hypocrisy, threats of violence, abuse and the usual litany of megalomaniac greedies on the rampage - not exactly scientific, but that's how they are. Excommunication, heresy trials, burning at the stake - the usual high priestly attitudes and approaches to dissenters. Those are not convincing scientific arguments for Global Warming. "Enough talk. Let's gaol them and beat them. Hey, the world is over populated, let's kill them...." yes, seen it all before. David Suzuki looks like a chimp and acts like one. <That's demonstrably not true - as anyone can plainly see if they read the scientific literature, which is now overwhelmingly in favor of the GW anthropic theory > Simply repeating an untruth doesn't make it true. Though as Godwin's principle says, Nazis repeating a BIG lie often enough gets people to believe it. Once you can get them believing lies against their better judgment, you've got them. Perhaps there are honest, reasoning Alarmists who are not in it for the money, power, perks, girls and jamborees. Please name them. Or maybe just 3 of them. Mqurice