Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Riley G who wrote (19030)	11/17/1997 3:00:00 PM
From: Michael P. Weber	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

Just an FYI for everyone. Your letter's to the NASD will most likely be transferred to another District office that has jurisdiction over the main office of the Brokerage firm that you purchased your RMIL from. This is what happened in my case. Mike

To: Riley G who wrote (19030)	11/17/1997 3:13:00 PM
From: Ditchdigger	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 55532

Riley, your answer is most definitely unacceptable. <Take it our leave it, and do your on DD> This weak answer shines a very bright light on the quality of your numbers. It appears you just pulled them out of your hat and cannot back up your calculations with real numbers, for real scrutiny.I would find it very hard to invest in this stock if your numbers are the focal point-which they are. DD

To: Riley G who wrote (19030)	11/17/1997 3:28:00 PM
From: Malcolm Thomas	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

Come on Riley!! Leadership is needed on this issue. Explain how you made your calculations and put this issue to bed once and for all! A lack of explanation on your part will only further undermine and continue the confusion.

To: Riley G who wrote (19030)	11/17/1997 7:23:00 PM
From: Kurt N	Respond to of 55532

If you posted your actual calculations on the float and a breakdown of the number of shares that are still Rule 144 (and the obligations that the company has to insure a mininum value of those issued shares), it would lay this issue to rest and make the Nays shut up for good. (Of course they would probably find something else to b**ch and moan about.) I believe that your count in the number of shares that people, including myself, reported to you is accurate. I would like to see the total count that Pugs/HRAKA is doing merged in. If their count is what I think it is, then even if the company had to issue extra shares it wouldn't be an issue. Right now if all the shares issued were in the float or more get added (that aren't Rule 144 merger shares), your count wouldn't be enough for a short squeeze. If the company gets $10 million instead of $5 million, they can use $2-4 million to honor their previous commitments, and no extra shares could possibly get added to the float (besides the merger shares). Kurt