SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: armi who wrote (43257)7/10/2011 3:35:43 PM
From: Jurgis Bekepuris  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 78652
 
Not really.

Depends on what you mean by "Graham mold", but 100% real Graham net-nets are very rare and Graham probably would not have liked even the ones that occur like GRVY. If you mean kinda-somewhat-Graham-since-he-mentioned-various-different-metrics-in-various-places, then maybe.

E.g. if you take Chapter 5 from "Intelligent investor" and use the following criteria:

1. Diversification: 10-30 stocks
2. Each company selected should be large, prominent, and conservatively financed.
3. Each company should have a long record of continuous dividend payment. (since 1950 :P)
4. Price limit at 25 times 7 year average earnings, 20 times last year's earnings.

then there's tons of stocks that fall into this "mold". Including KO, PEP, JNJ, and so on. I'm not sure Burry was buying based on this either. ;)

So you have to define what you mean by Graham mold. ;)



To: armi who wrote (43257)7/10/2011 9:03:08 PM
From: Wallace Rivers  Respond to of 78652
 
Mike mentioned Graham in the original thread header. I would argue that he actually broke most "molds" with his intensive research which was followed up by a resolute commitment to the great majority of his positions.