SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (618856)7/11/2011 1:30:21 PM
From: TopCat  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1579980
 
"That's stupid."

Were you surprised?



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (618856)7/11/2011 3:57:25 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1579980
 
Ted, > Newspapers in this country are hardly liberal and for good reason, they are owned by corps.

That's one of the dumbest retreat tactics I've ever seen.


Newspapers today no more reflect the liberal bent than does Boehner. I read the weekend Seattle Times to get the news and not because it reflects my ideology. Ditto with the NY Times. Most media in this country is center right. It only looks liberal to you because you are so far to the right.

Newspapers often tilt their reporting from a liberal perspective. Columnists often spout the Democratic party line, especially Paul Krugman and Maureen Dowd. Whenever they endorse candidates, they almost always vote (D).

Those are two journalists in a sea of journalists. I am no more impressed than you would be if I cited two of the many conservative journalists working for major papers.

This is a center right country. Why would the media be coming from the left? It does not make any sense.

Yet you want to claim that newspapers aren't liberal because they're owned by corporations? That's stupid.

Why is that stupid?