Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (618993)	7/12/2011 11:43:27 AM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1580593

>> When you have a net negative import bill of $50 billion which was the amount last month and $30 billion of that was due to importing oil, a national energy policy is desperately needed. Oh, no doubt we need a national energy policy, but this has NOTHING WHATSOEVER to do with the light bulb debate. NOTHING. We do NOT use imported oil to make electricity. Your entire post was about imported oil, a TOTALLY unrelated topic. A national energy policy would not just focus on the consumption of oil but all sources of energy. That would include NG, nukes and coal which are the primary sources of energy for burning lite bulbs. That's energy policy 101. Try to stay up. Back to the subject. If I want to pay $5/gallon for gas to burn at 8 mpg, WTF business is it of yours or Obama's or Congress'? We can get off foreign oil easily by using our own resources. We don't need government to do it for us, they just need to get out of the way. Not only are you nuts you're a complete asshole. You think we need a national energy policy but you don't want to participate in one. So very typical of wingers. Its not worth discussing important matters with you all because you are incapable of reigning in your childish ways.