Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (619026)	7/12/2011 2:43:37 PM
From: Alighieri	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1580471

Was there any mention of fracking in a negative context. Did you even watch it? Both sides were presented...all the environmentalist said was that there was enough evidence to make monitoring critical...have a problem with that? Al

To: i-node who wrote (619026)	7/12/2011 4:07:28 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1580471

> In fact that's all the environmental advocate said in the 60min piece, which I found quite balanced, despite dave's characterization. Of course YOU found it balanced. You're a leftwing nutjob. So a news piece written by left wing nutjobs seems perfectly balanced to you. Where do you get off calling Al a nutjob? Because he's willing to do his homework before jumping head first into mess like they way the Rs did with Iraq? Hydrofracking works with very toxic chemicals in the ground where no one can see where its going. Water laden with chemicals will flow down until it finds a bottom.........and that's where the ground water is located. Hence the concern.........don't be stupid. And show some more respect to the father of two Iraqi veterans.