Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Manmade Global Warming, A hoax? A Scam? or a Doomsday Cult? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (2735)	7/13/2011 12:38:38 AM
From: Don Hurst	1 Recommendation Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 4326

Jorj, I saw this comment posted after an article about the extreme temperatures which sums up some things I have posted on this thread before... >>" As I posted earlier to the climate change deniers: The way I see it...If you are wrong, there are dire consequences that will be too late to do anything about. If we are wrong...all you have is,well, cleaner water, cleaner air, a cleaner world period. Hard choice to make? "<< What I would add to the "if we are wrong" side is... We would be well on our way to clean renewable energy sources and a much higher level of national energy independence and national security. We could have cleaner forms of very cost competitive mass and individual transportation using renewable energy supplies . We would have a major source of new employment and possibly products and technology to export. . We could have a new smart energy supplying grid and possibly new forms of decentralized, more reliable, less expensive energy supplies for our homes and workplaces mainly independent of a large central source. As the commenter states "hard choice to make". Why is this obvious choice so hard for you deniers to make and so easy for you deniers to say No, No?