Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Land Shark who wrote (34814)	7/13/2011 7:23:17 PM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 36917

Hansen's changes/adjustments to historical temperature records are NOT peer reviewed. They're made with no notice or explanation.

To: Land Shark who wrote (34814)	7/13/2011 7:50:22 PM
From: LLCF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36917

<This is pure nonsense. This data is peer reviewed. The blogs are not.> As I said, he doesn't have the foggiest notion about science, let along "peer review". He thinks "Scientific American" is the same as "Science" or "Nature". Further, he claims dopey Intelligent design "promoters" don't get "published" because they are discriminated against although he can't seem to find anything even remotely worth publishing on any of their websites, books, papers... nada. DAK