SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Groupon, Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: stockman_scott who wrote (65)7/14/2011 8:23:30 PM
From: Glenn Petersen  Respond to of 480
 
The amended S-1:

sec.gov



To: stockman_scott who wrote (65)7/15/2011 2:37:15 PM
From: Glenn Petersen1 Recommendation  Respond to of 480
 
Hundreds Turn To Millions For Groupon Founders

By Russ Garland
Wall Street Journal
July 15, 2011, 11:35 AM ET

In its updated IPO filing, Groupon may have disavowed the statement by co-founder and Executive Chairman Eric Lefkofsky that the daily deals company would be “wildly profitable,” but there’s no denying that Groupon has already been extraordinarily profitable for him.

The initial S-1 filing disclosed that Lefkofsky and other insiders had reaped millions through stock repurchases by the Chicago-based company after later venture rounds pegged its value in the billions. But the new filing shows how little money some of them put in (see chart below).

Case in point: two vehicles owned or managed by Lefkofsky and his wife, Green Media LLC and 600 West Groupon LLC, redeemed stock worth a total of $386 million after Groupon’s Series F and G rounds. The updated filing discloses what the LLCs paid for those shares.

The total: $546. Yes, you read that right.


To be fair, founders and early employees sometimes do extraordinarily well by investing mostly their time and sweat in companies that eventually go public or get acquired. But the profits of Lefkofsky are stunning, especially when you consider that through his investment vehicles he still holds 21.5% of Groupon’s Class A common stock.

The profits so far of the two earliest venture-capital investors pale by comparison. In the $946 million Series G financing last December and January, Accel Partners’ growth fund pocketed $20 million by redeeming shares it bought for $1.44 million. New Enterprise Associates got $70 million for shares that originally cost the firm $1.36 million. Accel still owns 5.6% of the company; NEA holds 14.7%.

It’s the willingness of private investors to pour money into consumer Internet companies such as Groupon that is letting insiders richly reward themselves before tapping the public markets. Groupon used only $132 million of that Series G to run the company. The rest, after issuance costs, went to redeem shares.

The enablers the Series G redemptions include well-known venture firms such as Greylock Partners and Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers – which put in $65 million apiece – as well as mutual fund companies such as Fidelity Investments and T. Rowe Price – on the hook for $100 million each. The financing came after Groupon reportedly passed on a $6 billion acquisition offer from Google.

If Groupon indeed pulls off an IPO that values the company at $20 billion, those investors should do fine. But the returns won’t be wild. It’s Internet company founders like Lefkofsky, who – perhaps recalling the carnage when the dot-com bubble burst – are ensuring big wins by taking chips off the table while they can.

We’ve pasted the related tables below for your convenience. They don’t include the footnotes, so if you want those, please consult the filing on pages 116 and 117.



blogs.wsj.com



To: stockman_scott who wrote (65)7/16/2011 4:48:12 PM
From: Glenn Petersen1 Recommendation  Respond to of 480
 
Groupon Deals Attract Connecticut's Scrutiny

By MICHAEL HICKINS
Wall Street Journal
JULY 15, 2011

Connecticut law-enforcement officials are looking into whether online deals site Groupon Inc. is breaking consumer-protection laws that prohibit gift cards from expiring.

According to Jeremy Pearlman, one of two assistant attorneys general handling the investigation for George Jepsen, attorney general for the state of Connecticut, the state is looking into whether Groupon's deals—known as groupons—should be considered in the same light as gift certificates, for which Connecticut law bans expiration dates altogether.

"If groupons meet the definition of a gift certificate, we feel there may be a violation of the state law," Mr. Pearlman said.

In a written statement, Groupon said it intends to cooperate with the Connecticut attorney general and help "him and his team understand our business model."

The company declined to comment on whether it considers groupons to be like gift certificates.

Groupon promotes discounts and shares the revenue from the sale of its deals with the merchants offering the goods or services. The offers are heavily discounted in order to ensure they are snapped up quickly, but consumer advocates say the deals often come with conditions that aren't always clear to customers, such as expiration dates. Consumer advocates also say customers might not be aware of other terms and conditions affecting their deals, including local taxes will be owed on alcohol or tobacco on top of the discount, or that the clock starts ticking on a 90-day health-club membership when a groupon is purchased, as opposed to the first time the consumer goes to the gym.

In a letter to Groupon Chief Executive Andrew Mason, Mr. Jepsen asked Groupon to "explain the terms under which groupons are sold to and redeemed by consumers, how much revenue those sales generate in Connecticut and how frequently expiration dates are imposed on the sale of goods and services at a discount."

In the letter, Mr. Jepsen said "it appears that what Groupon, Inc. sells or offers may fall within the definition of a gift certificate under Connecticut law," but he added that he hasn't "prejudged Groupon or reached any conclusions."

Connecticut law defines gift certificates as "a record evidencing a promise, made for consideration, by the seller or issuer of the record that goods or services will be provided to the owner of the record to the value shown in the record."

Consumer advocates are split as to whether groupons should be considered in the same light as gift cards.

Linda Sherry, a spokeswoman for Consumer Action, said the fact that consumers pay for the groupons means "they really are more like gift cards than coupons. You're paying for them."

She added, "A coupon may save you money if you choose to use it, but in no case will it cost you money."

But Jack Gillis, a spokesman for the Consumer Federation of America, sees things differently. "If you spend $100 for a gift card and then it devalues over time, that would not be expected. But most people understand that coupons expire."

He said the reason companies such as Groupon are coming under increasing scrutiny is that "we've never purchased coupons before, and that's what makes it different."

Mr. Gillis added that complaints are likely to increase as less-Internet-savvy consumers start trying these types of services. "The key is going to be clear and accurate disclosure...Full disclosure will really protect [these companies] from a growing sense of unease" among consumers, he said.

online.wsj.com



To: stockman_scott who wrote (65)7/24/2011 9:36:31 AM
From: Glenn Petersen1 Recommendation  Respond to of 480
 
Suffering from Groupon remorse? Sites can right a wrong purchase

By Candice Choi
Ap Personal Finance Writer
The Durango Herald
Article Last Updated: Friday, July 22, 2011 4:11pm

NEW YORK – Wish you hadn’t bought that daily deal for a hot air balloon ride? You’re not alone.

A growing number of shoppers with buyer’s remorse are tapping an emerging resale market to unload the coupons they no longer want from sites like Groupon and LivingSocial.

For the uninitiated, daily deal sites offer limited-time discounts of as much as 90 percent on a variety of products and services. But the elements that make the deals so enticing – the steep price cuts, limited supply and countdown clock – also can be a potent mix for impulse purchases.

The pitfalls are apparent in a key statistic: an estimated 20 percent of the discounts are never redeemed.

That’s where sites like DealsGoRound.com come into play. There’s no charge for sellers to list an unwanted coupon, but the sites takes a 10 percent cut if it’s sold. At Lifesta.com, another resale site for daily deals, sellers pay 99 cents plus 8 percent of the sale price. Buyers don’t pay any fees on either site.

“People buy deals with good intentions,” says Kris Petersen, founder and CEO of DealsGoRound. “But then the planning doesn’t come together or they run out of time to use the deal.”

The emergence of the resale market is a natural outgrowth of the explosive popularity of daily deal sites in the last year. Although Groupon and LivingSocial are by far the biggest and best known players in the space, there are now an estimated 400 similar sites, according Daily Deal Media, which tracks the industry. And this year, consumers are expected to spend an estimated $1.9 billion snapping up bargains, about double the amount spent last year.

The deals are usually tilted toward a higher-end clientele, with offers including discounts on restaurant vouchers, wine tasting tours and shiatsu massages. But circumstances can sometimes prevent shoppers from redeeming their coupons.

After paying $40 for a month of unlimited yoga classes on Groupon, Michael Roman found a more convenient venue for practicing his downward dog. So he decided to list the coupon on DealsGoRound.

He listed the deal for the same amount he paid, with plans to lower the price if it didn’t sell quickly. But the coupon sold within hours.

“The immediacy is what surprised me,” says Roman, a 47-year-old business analyst from Chicago.

If a coupon is popular enough, sellers may even be able to fetch a small profit. Because daily deal sites offer such steep discounts, sellers can list their coupons for more than they paid and still offer a bargain. For buyers, resale sites offer access to deals that are no longer available.

In other cases, sellers may have to ask for less than they paid. This usually happens when a coupon’s expiration date is fast approaching or if the retailer or service is too obscure.

The worst-case scenario is that sellers never find a buyer; DealsGoRound says that happens with about a third of its listings.

It’s worth noting that technically, Groupon’s terms of use prohibit the unauthorized resale of its coupons. The fine print on LivingSocial’s site also prohibits the sale of its vouchers. But DealsGoRound, which is based in the same building as Groupon’s Chicago headquarters, notes that it has operated for more than a year without hearing concerns from any daily deal sites. It says it would honor any requests to stop listing coupons from specific sites.

In any case, consumers are flocking to DealsGoRound and Lifesta. The sites both have listings in more than 100 cities, shadowing the markets where Groupon and LivingSocial do most their business. DealsGoRound recently listed about 300 deals in Chicago; Lifesta listed about 500 in San Francisco.

Groupon notes that it doesn’t encourage the use of resale site because it can’t guarantee the authenticity of the coupons sold on them. But both DealsGoRound and Lifesta guarantee buyers refunds if there are any problems with the coupons. The sites require sellers to electronically submit coupon vouchers before they’re listed.

Like eBay, they work as intermediaries so transactions are kept seamless.

“There’s no meeting someone at Starbucks hoping they’ll show up,” said Petersen of DealsGoRound.

Another site, CoupRecoup.com, works more like Craigslist and lets buyers contact sellers directly. CoupRecoup doesn’t offer any guarantees, but sellers may like it because there are no fees.

Before turning to the resale market, however, check out whether it’s possible to get a refund directly from the daily deal site.

LivingSocial gives shoppers five days to return deals for any reason. Groupon doesn’t offer such leeway. But the site says its customer service team works on a case-by-case basis to give buyers refunds or site credit if they can’t redeem a coupon for a legitimate reason. An example might be if a customer couldn’t attend a concert because of a medical emergency.

There’s another little-known clause worth nothing. To comply with federal and state laws, Groupon and LivingSocial say their coupons only lose their promotional value after the expiration date. The coupons are still good for however much the buyer paid for it.

So if a shopper pays $20 for a $40 restaurant voucher, the voucher is still good for $20 even after the expiration date. If customers run into problems, the sites will work with merchants to ensure the coupons are honored.

There are cases where buyers will simply be out of luck, however. For example, if you buy a deal for an event like a concert and it passes, there’s no way to get your money back.

durangoherald.com



To: stockman_scott who wrote (65)7/27/2011 4:56:49 PM
From: Glenn Petersen1 Recommendation  Respond to of 480
 
There is a bit of hyperbole in this piece. If Groupon is able to pull off a mid-September offering, that will be about three and a half months after their initial filing. That would qualify as a quick offering. I assume that Groupon and its underwriters have a small army working on the registration statement.

Groupon Accounting Is Prolonging SEC Review

By: Kate Kelly, With Reporting By Jesse Bergman
CNBC
Published: Wednesday, 27 Jul 2011 | 1:07 PM ET

Concerns from regulators about Groupon’s accounting metrics are prolonging the company’s pre-initial public offering document review, according to people familiar with the matter. The Internet group-discount site is now eyeing a mid to late-September debut, two of these people added.

Since early June, when Groupon filed its initial S-1 registration documents to go public, staffers at the Securities and Exchange Commission have been poring over the company’s financials, say these people, and have already made a first wave of suggested tweaks.

Some of those were reflected in an amended S-1 filed in mid-July, one of these people says, which included a toned-down letter from Groupon’s chief executive and a more detailed explanation of how the company measures its own success.

But the SEC remains focused on at least two of the company’s favored accounting metrics, say the people familiar with the matter: gross profits and consolidated segment operating income, or CSOI.

Gross profits, which Groupon argues are an important way to look at revenue, are the portion of a sale that the discount provider keeps after paying the merchant that provided the service. But gross profits don’t include certain marketing and other administrative costs associated with making those sales.

CSOI is a way of measuring operating income that does not include a range of expenses that Groupon considers to be one-offs, including online marketing costs and stock-based compensation. As a result, some critics don’t think it’s a good way to gauge true profitability.

Groupon is working through the SEC’s concerns, say the people familiar with the matter, and will not allow red flags surrounding CSOI to scuttle its IPO plans, according to one of these people— even if that means downplaying or ultimately removing the metric from the company’s final S-1 filing.

In fact, Groupon has already added new contextual language to its amended registration document, saying that CSOI, “while not a valuation metric...provides us with critical visibility into our business.”

Groupon’s upcoming IPO is one of the most hotly anticipated of the year, and will be closely watched as a harbinger of success for the Internet’s group-discount providers, which include LivingSocial (which is also formulating IPO plans). But the company is already contending with the impact of increased scrutiny—including a technology-conference appearance in which CEO Andrew Mason gave his interviewer the silent treatment and negative reactions to comments made by Chairman Eric Lefkofsky the day after the original IPO filing that Groupon will be “wildly profitable.”

In one example of how Groupon has had to retrace some of its public steps, a now-infamous letter from Mason at the beginning of the company’s June 2 registration document has been softened and moved back multiple pages in the amended filing. In the newer filing, dated July 14, the word “struggling” was changed to “dealing,” and a line about how certain “investments in growth” had in the past “turned a healthy forecasted quarterly profit into a sizable loss” was deleted entirely.

But the amended letter still contains a provocative line that reveals Mason’s self-deprecating humor about starting his business: “After selling out on our original mission of saving the world to start hawking coupons, in order to live with ourselves, we vowed to make Groupon a service that people loved using.”

Follow Kate on Twitter: @katekellycnbc

cnbc.com



To: stockman_scott who wrote (65)7/28/2011 4:38:54 PM
From: Glenn Petersen1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 480
 
Groupon's Accounting Lingo Gets Scrutiny

By SHAYNDI RAICE And NICK WINGFIELD
Wall Street Journal
July 28, 2011

Groupon Inc. has attracted scrutiny from regulators over a newfangled accounting metric it is using to market itself to investors ahead of its initial public offering, said a person familiar with the situation.

The Securities and Exchange Commission has asked Groupon to answer questions about the unusual measure it invented, which paints a more robust picture of performance by excluding marketing and other expenses, this person said.

The company's IPO, expected this fall, is one of several multibillion dollar technology offerings teed up for this year. Some of those companies, which are unprofitable, also highlight creative ways to measure their businesses.

The financial gymnastics harken back to Silicon Valley's late 1990s dot-com boom, when companies introduced terms like "eyeballs," or the number of people visiting a website, to reinforce how much traction they had with consumers, even if the start-up had no revenue.

John Coffee, a professor at the law school at Columbia University, said the SEC has become more cautious about using nontraditional metrics after the dot-com bubble and subsequent bust. "The more we get into a bubble, the more we have analysts wanting to use numbers giving a sense of momentum," said Mr. Coffee. "In social media, there are signs of a bubble and that creates some nervousness at the commission."

SEC spokesman John Nester declined to comment specifically on Groupon. He said the agency's "staff currently reviews all IPO filings, and an average range from filing to effective date might be three to six months."

Groupon, whose IPO is expected to value the company at $20 billion, has highlighted in regulatory filings something it calls "adjusted consolidated segment operating income," or adjusted CSOI. Investors and analysts said that draws attention away from marketing costs, which are causing the company to hemorrhage money.

While it isn't unusual for companies to use nonstandard financial measurements, Ben Strubel, a portfolio manager with Strubel Investment Management, a money management firm in Lancaster, Penn., says he has "never encountered" the one Groupon is using. "In essence Groupon is asking investors to look at their profit before any expenses," says Mr. Strubel, who doesn't plan to invest in the IPO and has no intention of shorting the stock. "It's not a surprise they want investors to focus on measures that don't include expenses since their expenses have been rising."

Groupon's adjusted CSOI is one of several nonstandard growth metrics that have increasingly come to prominence along with the new set of Internet companies.

Internet games maker Zynga Inc., in its July IPO filing, used a metric called "bookings." The term reflects the total amount of revenue from Zynga's two main businesses—the sale of virtual goods and ads—if it had recognized all of the revenue immediately at the time of a sale. Facebook Inc., the fast-growing social network, occasionally discloses MAU, or monthly active users.

Facebook hasn't filed to go public, and it is unclear whether it would use the MAU figure in regulatory filings. A person familiar with the matter said the SEC hasn't questioned Zynga's filing.

Pandora Media Inc.'s first IPO filing included total listener hours and total registered users as "key indicators of the growth of our business," though the Internet music firm cautioned that the total users figure was an imperfect measure.

The SEC allowed Pandora to keep the terms in its prospectus, along with a measure called "total active users" that was added in its fourth amendment. The original prospectus was amended six times before Pandora went public last month. Such amending is common.

Groupon, a 2 ½-year-old Chicago-based company, has grown at a torrid pace with its approach of selling daily deals to consumers in partnerships with local merchants. But it has been racking up losses as it spends heavily on marketing to acquire customers.

Groupon's IPO filing says that adjusted CSOI gives investors a look at the company's performance by excluding "expenses that are noncash or otherwise not indicative of future operating expenses."

Groupon said it generated $81.6 million in adjusted CSOI in the first quarter of 2011, though if marketing costs are taken into account that figure would be a loss of $98 million.

To address concerns over adjusted CSOI, Groupon filed an amendment on July 14 to its initial SEC filing. In that amendment, Groupon clarified the metric "should not be considered as a measure of discretionary cash available to us to invest in the growth of our business or as a valuation metric."

Instead, the company said investors should look at standard financial metrics such as cash flow, net loss and others when evaluating its performance.

Groupon plans to file another amendment to address the SEC's concerns over adjusted CSOI and still aims to go public in mid-September, said people familiar with the matter.

CNBC earlier reported the SEC was reviewing Groupon's accounting metrics.

The flap over adjusted CSOI is the latest issue Groupon has run into during the regulatory period before its IPO. Eric Lefkofsky, a Groupon co-founder who is now executive chairman, was quoted by Bloomberg News as saying that "Groupon is going to be wildly profitable" just three days after the company filed for its IPO. Speaking publicly about the financial projections of a company that has filed to go public is restricted by the SEC.

In its July 14 amended filing, Groupon said Mr. Lefkofsky "requested that the statement not be published. The reported statement does not accurately or completely reflect Mr. Lefkofsky's views and should not be considered by prospective investors in isolation or at all."

Lou Kerner, an analyst with Wedbush Securities who covers privately held Web firms, said he believes the new metrics like adjusted CSOI aren't unique to Web companies, but are part of the regular course of how businesses evaluate themselves.

"This is more art than science and it's ever evolving," he said, noting that earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, or Ebitda, a regularly used metric of cash flow, was once unknown. "Smart investors should look at the metrics they want, not the numbers that a company shoves in your face."

—Michael Rapoport and Lynn Cowan contributed to this article.

online.wsj.com