Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : ECHARTERS -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Natedog who wrote (3585)	7/18/2011 3:13:57 PM
From: E. Charters	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3744

You fool! ;) Anyone could have told you that Bre-X was worth $200 if it was worth a dime. More experience would have taught you to hold on until you could see the whites of the promoter's eyes. I know one guy who held to 3 bucks and lost it all. I remember trying to get him into a good investment awhile back and he kept referring mysteriously to this big thing he was into that was going to realize soon, and he could not afford to segue. Well the good thing was Bre-X. He jumped the day after it crashed. Another guy who used to post here lost $30 million. I told him how to sue SNC Lavalin who took over Kilborn, and where to sue so that statute law was on his side. BC. He sued in Texas and the judge threw it out. Ignorant, or paid off SOB. Subsequent lawsuit failed in BC. largely because of graft I think. Or judge did not know the BC engineering law concerning engineering companies reporting on assays. Personal verification or no report. Disclaimers do not get you off the hook. Even without that law a good lawyer could have got Kilborn for a coupla bill because of their lending their name to the assays regardless of the fine print. More than anything the imprimatur of Kilborn led the investors down the garden path. Yes, panning for gold leads to gold veins in rock. yes it does. Got to teach the pups what the old dogs knew. EC<:-}