Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Spekulatius who wrote (43471)	7/21/2011 12:02:17 PM
From: ValueGuy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78688

hmmm...must cast my eye over some airports if i get the chance like you i would prefer trading any stock not listed in the main us markets in the original exchanges themselves through IB

To: Spekulatius who wrote (43471)	7/29/2011 2:28:00 AM
From: ValueGuy	1 Recommendation Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 78688

Clownbuck Interesting piece from SA on some new ETFs being launched by Global X. I thought I'd post it for everyone's benefit. Have not read it in much detail yet but I am warming to the idea of toll roads and ports. ETF provider Global X appears to be cranking up its golly-gee-whiz machine with an ETF filing that is right in the wheelhouse of a lot of my posts over the last couple of years. The filing consists of the following: Global X FTSE Toll Roads & Ports ETF Global X FTSE Railroads ETF Global X Farmland and Timberland ETF Global X Cement ETF Global X Advanced Materials ETF My primary contact at the firm talked about the Cement and Toll Road & Ports as being my ideas, which I'm sure is part flattery ... but if it is true, then maybe they'll send me a bag of Quikrete if the cement fund lists (humor attempt). Zooming out a little bit, the utility to these types of funds is in narrow-based portfolios where individual stocks might be difficult in terms of feeling comfortable with information available or liquidity or anything else. That might seem like an obvious statement, but what I mean is that it doesn't really take a colossal leap of faith to buy shares of DuPont ( DD) from the materials sector. At any given time, DD could be a bad hold or a good hold, but companies like this tend not to permanently impair capital. They are easy to access, are widely followed by analysts (you may choose not to heed their opinion, but they are sources of information) and you can find a lot of information yourself all over the web. A stock like DD is going to look a lot like its corresponding sector ETF, in this case iShares Materials ( IYM), the vast majority of the time making one a type of proxy for the other. The above is a little different with a group like cement stocks. Getting a lot of information about Cementos Argos ( CMTOY.PK) from Colombia would not be as easy. There is an English version of the company website, but it is unlikely that you could go to Yahoo Finance to find a bunch of analyst info, get a few pages of results with a search at WSJ, then hop over to Seeking Alpha to get a lot of color ... although you'd probably have luck looking at the numbers from BusinessWeek. While I do not know yet what the index that will underly the cement fund looks like, there are cement companies in many emerging markets and, intending to be very obvious, a lot of the stuff that is needed to modernize these countries requires cement. Other than Cemex ( CX), which you may recall bought Rinker awhile ago, I am not aware of any emerging market cement companies on the NYSE or Nasdaq; these companies are usually not prominent in ETFs, although CMTOY does have a 5% weight in Global X Colombia ( GXG). I think the group is a great way to get a little smaller with emerging market exposure, and to me there is a clear and obvious need for more cement. As an example, pairing DuPont, a name we don't own, and its 3% yield with something thematic like the cement ETF would cover a lot of ground in the materials sector in terms of radically different exposures within the sector, a reasonable foreign and growthy footprint (probably), different volatility characteristics and a theme whose demand is easy to understand. Not a bad strategy at the sector level. The other big fund for me in the listing is the Toll Roads & Ports ETF. Generally I think of these as most like utilities but with a little more volatility. I think these are a great way into a lot of countries, including China. They play into the aspiration of driving a car, which has a very steady demand behind it. With many of them, especially in China, the business also includes various services like rest stops, repair and hotels. The port aspect of this fund (not sure if it will include airports; at one point it was going to) captures the economy for better or for worse as cargo comes and goes. The Railroad ETF would seem to be similar in that regard, although I would expect more cyclicality and volatility with less yield. Farmland and Timberland could be more of a play on plantations than the current BARN ETF from Global X; if so, I think would be a neat but very volatile exposure. Of course, I take any article from SA with a healthy dose of salt, but thought it may be a good starting point to look into the underlying stocks.