Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Larry Brubaker who wrote (27278)	11/17/1997 9:10:00 PM
From: Bob Jagow	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

Larry, We may have been "told we had a recovery process that was capable of extracting these levels in bulk amounts", but there were lots of warning signs on that; the "no measurable degradation" phrase that appeared in two PRs touting scaleup scared the hell out of me! What that said to me [and I voiced here and in e-mails] was that the process was definately not scalable in any economic sense. The economics was not meant to be addressed in this report, so it is my read that the same fiction might well have been perpetuated once more but for Bateman's good sense! JMHO-Bob

To: Larry Brubaker who wrote (27278)	11/17/1997 9:39:00 PM
From: Erich White	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 35569

<I invested because I was told repeatable .80 opt, and a recovery process that works in bulk amounts.> Amen!...you just crystalized my (and I'm sure many others') thoughts on this whole debacle. I sold today for the very same reasons you mentioned - not to mention that I believe the price would only deteriorate from here in the coming weeks. **OFF TOPIC** Anyone have any favorites now in this bargain basement gold market? - We have to be somewhere near the bottom don't we????