SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: i-node who wrote (621327)7/25/2011 4:28:25 PM
From: bentway  Respond to of 1578817
 
Gawker Sues Chris Christie, Fox's Ailes

CLAIMS THAT THE NETWORK CHAIRMAN IS PUSHING POLITICS
( Fox should lose their FCC license. All they do is terrorize America's stupid and less intelligent. Akin to conning the retarded..)


By Tim Karan, Newser Staff

Posted Jul 25, 2011 2:14 PM CDT

(NEWSER) – Gawker has filed a lawsuit to determine the nature of communication between New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie and Fox News chairman Roger Ailes, reports. The civil suit stems from a profile on Ailes that the magazine published in May, revealing that he had pushed Christie to enter the presidential race. When Gawker reporter John Cook attempted to research communication records between the pair, Christie's administration refused, citing executive privilege.
The lawsuit—the first ever by Gawker to obtain information—alleges that Ailes, a former Republican strategist, is still working in politics, says the investigation. The case states, "A strong public interest exists in knowing whether the executive in charge of the nation’s most-watched cable news channel is acting as a political consultant to a prospective Republican presidential candidate.” When the request for records was refused, Ailes told Gawker through a representative, "Whatever the governor wants to do is his business." Cook told the New York Times, “The next thing that I would like to be publicly acknowledged is not just that [Fox News is] ideological— they’re not just the TV equivalent of the Weekly Standard or something—they are actually a power base within the Republican Party."
[/font]



To: i-node who wrote (621327)7/25/2011 4:36:57 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1578817
 
Do you have any idea how statistically significant this is?

Why don't you tell us,Ted, how "statistically significant" this is? Please show your work.

I think you wouldn't know statistical significance if it bit you on the ass.


Well let me see. I probably should show my work. Then again, you all are idiots. Why would I bother? I think I'll go with Plan B. ;-)



To: i-node who wrote (621327)7/25/2011 4:47:30 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1578817
 
Inode, > Why don't you tell us,Ted, how "statistically significant" this is? Please show your work.

Notice how quickly Ted retreats when you demand substance?

Tenchusatsu