Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Evolution -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (15717)	7/26/2011 3:00:13 PM
From: LLCF	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 69300

<So you think New Scientist was off base and shouldn't have even published that article. > NO! Great article... and actually.. THANKS for posting it... I really like this kind of stuff... because as you know I believe there is great intelligence in even single celled organisms that is not recognized or appreciated even in the scientific community... Solon should listen up as he sort of doubted my earlier assertions. I don't remember YOUR position on that. :) Again, great article. <Because you ARE disputing the theme of their article.> You'll have to show me where... it's a great article and I didn't see ANY THEME pointing to ANY falsification evolution. Again, the smarter and more potential single cells have... the greater evolutionary potential there is. If anything this makes the idea that plants can't come from bacteria (your earlier assertion) for example that much more archaic. :) No, to be fair to one of your favorite "boogie men" (origin of life or "abiogenesis), it CERTAINLY ARGUES AGAINST some "random" beginning of life theory like "primordial soup" proposed by Miller Urey and that ilk. Course I've always thought THAT was silly, but hopefully this gets scientists thinking that way to think differently. DAK