SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Creative Labs (CREAF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: CHIP HUNTER who wrote (5827)11/17/1997 10:35:00 PM
From: Jon Tara  Respond to of 13925
 
Hmmm... I wonder if it's even possible to libel an anonymous party...

As far as we know, you may just be a computer program set up to read SI posts and post annoying responses. Sorta like a Serder Argic for SI.

(Serdar Argic is/was a "bot" that roamed through any Usenet newsgroup relating in any way to Turkey (the country), and spewed back automated responses that were keyed on certain phrases, and put forth a revisionist history of the time around WWI. It was quite amusing to see it's responses to Christmas recipies involving a certain stuffed bird. :) )



To: CHIP HUNTER who wrote (5827)11/17/1997 10:57:00 PM
From: CJay  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13925
 
Dearest Chip:
You are so good at taking one thing out of context and ignoring the rest of everyone's posts.
I simply meant that the lawsuit held the stock back---and since you claim to have seen
this slowdown in your chart, this implied to me that you saw the lawsuit in your chart.
Of course, any knucklehead (i.e. you, Chip) should be able to tell I was being facetious.
I really don't believe you saw the lawsuit--or anything else, for that matter---in your chart, since it does not exist.
So of course, you could not be insider trading, tough guy. You are just blowing smoke, as usual.

CJay---sitting here trembling

PS--Chip--its been real, but dont post me anymore--I would email you, but you dont have an email address. You keep
going in circles and noone buys any of it. So if i ignore you, I just got tired of the out of context mistatements, the gloating,
and the silly questions you pose on each post. I will let others on this board address you---which they have done well--but frankly,
it would probably be better if we all ignored you. Or just laughed at you, which I do quite often.