SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Cymer (CYMI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tulvio Durand who wrote (9957)11/18/1997 12:25:00 AM
From: Starlight  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25960
 
Tulvio - An X-ray stepper costs around $7-8 million. JMAR's point source was quoted at $2 mil. at the annual meeting. I think you are mixing "apples and oranges". A synchrotron would cost $25 mil, plus if you equipped all 20 stepper "sites", that would be another $140-160 mil. (give or take a few mil.) Total synchrotron system cost - about $165-185, fully equipped with 20 steppers. Total JMAR system cost - about $10-11 million ($2 mil. for point source plus $8-9 mil. for the ONE stepper needed.) You said:>>>To service 18-20 steppers would require $72-to-$80 mil in source cost alone. Am I missing something?<<< Yes - The synchrotron (@$25 million) IS THE SOURCE for all 20 steppers connected to it. You wouldn't put point source into a synchrotron -- they are two SEPARATE AND DIFFERENT SOURCES.

Betty



To: Tulvio Durand who wrote (9957)11/18/1997 12:55:00 PM
From: MRothaus1  Respond to of 25960
 
<<Am I missing something?>>

You are missing the flexibility issue. And, I think the XRL point-source is more like $2 mill instead of $4 mill.

Companies like DUV and opticals because the 1:1 ratio of light source to stepper makes it easier to manage. The synchotron is one big expensive immovable machine.

With point-source XRL, companies can once again be flexible and have a 1:1 ratio just like opticals.