Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Plastics to Oil - Pyrolysis and Secret Catalysts and Alterna -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: scion who wrote (9958)	7/27/2011 10:41:53 AM
From: scion	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 53574

We had the asset purchase audited to ensure everything was properly accounted for, because it was an arms-length transaction, and because there are so many scams on the OTC. Zardiw Share Thursday, July 30, 2009 1:42:45 AM Re: Zardiw post# 3029 Post # of 124161 EMail from CEO: EMail from CEO: A few notes: 1) The costs reflected in the pro forma financial are for the entire quarter. 2) We are profitable after 2 days of processing tapes. 3) The asset purchase was audited by James Gately. We had the asset purchase audited to ensure everything was properly accounted for, because it was an arms-length transaction, and because there are so many scams on the OTC. Regards, John Bordynuik CEO 310 Holdings Inc Collaborative Researcher Math and Computation Group Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology john@csail.mit.edu people.csail.mit.edu z siliconinvestor.com

To: scion who wrote (9958)	1/22/2012 10:46:32 AM
From: scion	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 53574

I believe the catalyst was found on the same database as the one that had Gately non-expired accounting license, the signed contract from Al Sousa NOT being just an LOI,... Rawnoc Share Sunday, April 11, 2010 9:06:07 PM Re: scion post# 36763 Post # of 124059 I believe the catalyst was found on the same database as the one that had Gately non-expired accounting license, the signed contract from Al Sousa NOT being just an LOI, the non-payment for the chartpopper.com interview, and John did indeed giving back 31 million shares. I'm confident that it IS indeed the largest engineering archive in the world given that the source I used to confirm that was the same one that gave me the above information which too was proven to be correct, much to my humiliation for being skeptical about it, ya know? siliconinvestor.com Rawnoc Share Friday, April 09, 2010 2:49:28 PM Re: jobynimble post# 36415 Post # of 124059 No, no, I was reading about the materially false and misleading info that Gately didn't have an accounting license when the stock was near a buck. Fellow longs were urging people to call the company to verify that the government site wasn't up to date but would be soon. Those longs were mocked. I started to wonder myself. I was a skeptic myself back then to a certain large degree. I guess I should have just called the company to help locate the answers. WTF was I thinking? I have my brain dead moments. siliconinvestor.com Rawnoc Share Wednesday, April 07, 2010 10:58:55 PM Re: Scandle34 post# 36086 Post # of 124056 Correct. We've been down this road before at least half a dozen times where we all thought it was an "ah ha, gotcha" moment that turned out to be a mere delay the current info being posted. The most famous being Gately was it supposedly didn't have a license to do accounting. It turned out, like virtually all other skeptic hogwash, that it wasn't true. Posted by: Scandle34 Date: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 10:12:35 PM In reply to: Reseller Mike who wrote msg# 35970 Post # of 36096 what state agency do you know that actually posts new info immediately? It's on a desk somewhere i bet. siliconinvestor.com