Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Ride the Tiger with CD -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tyc:> who wrote (201553)	7/26/2011 11:38:36 PM
From: Claude Cormier	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 313024

I don't know where he is wrong as I haven't read his analisys. What I can say is that: 1) quite a few other producers produce a lot more gold than LSG, have much much higher cash flows than LSG and have (or recently had) smaller market caps. 2) Hochschild got rid of their interest in LSG and it seems they were right. 3) At least one other analyst was recently bearish on LSG: " CIBC World Markets analyst Barry Cooper is bearish on Lake Shore Gold ($2.16). The Globe's Darcy Keith writes in the Eye On Equities column that Mr. Cooper believes Lake Shore will have to restate reserves at its Timmins mine in Ontario using a lower grade, leading to higher operating and capital costs. " 4) I said LSG looks expensive when compared to its peers. I didn't say that it was expensive relative to its NAV5%.