Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alan Vennix who wrote (27302)	11/17/1997 11:03:00 PM
From: Amit Ghate	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 35569

>>Remember that the recovery numbers presented at the AGM were obtained at Friendship in their large equipment. Bateman was forced to do the verification experiments in the glass vessels in the mobile trailer.<< I wasn't aware of this. Why the restriction? (Sorry if an explanation has been posted previously, I don't have the stomach to wade through most of the posts here anymore.) TIA Amit

To: Alan Vennix who wrote (27302)	11/18/1997 1:07:00 AM
From: Bob Jagow	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 35569

Alan, Guess I'm not up to date on their processing resourses. Didn't they pay a bundle for the trailer and say the rest of FL wasn't worth the price? Is leasing the main FL facility still an option? Vs. Maxam's Vibramills, don't all-glass or glass-lined reactors seem mostly for chemical diddling, not mining? Wasn't there talk of a start on a tons/day processing facility? Any progress toward that? They were to draw on the $10M for their operational burn--the facility also? All factual material solicited, but do plead that Bill, EC and Zeev not yet back-of-the-envelope us to death :) Bob