Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Creative Labs (CREAF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: CHIP HUNTER who wrote (5833)	11/17/1997 11:32:00 PM
From: CJay	Respond to of 13925

Chip--one more time--last try at the brickwall that is your head--- please reread, or have your seeing eye dog reread for you, post 5831 which you just responded to. Please reread the PS part---if you keep posting me I will be forced to sue you for harrassment and for intentionally causing emotional distress. That post gives you my closing and final argument --so buzz off, turkey. "Good Luck in your investments, Chip!!!!" CJay

To: CHIP HUNTER who wrote (5833)	11/17/1997 11:35:00 PM
From: Gambit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13925

Don't take this the wrong way but it's getting to be like melrose place in here... I don't care to read about who said this or that, how when and at what price over and over and over. We will NEVER know so who cares. Keep the CREAF chan as good as it was a year ago. Let it R.I.P. Thank You Gambit

To: CHIP HUNTER who wrote (5833)	11/17/1997 11:44:00 PM
From: virgil vancleave	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13925

hey chip, if you want to short one that looks lik it could see some good downside, check out imnx (immunex). it literally has collapsed and if it breaks through 62ish on the downside it violates a prior gap. it moved straight through its 50 day ma today on pretty impressive volume. it is a high flyer and should provide us with an interesting short candidate. i may disagree with you on creaf, since the trend is still up and i feel it will continue after treading water for a while, but like yourself i am also a chartist (although i do look closely at fundamentals, and yes i do have a bs in mathematics). anyway creaf has none to little downside as compared to some other opportunities. btw, i also like nike as a short candidate (symbol nke) creaf will prove to be a short sale candidate, but the timing is definitely wrong here on it. my opinion for what it is worth.

To: CHIP HUNTER who wrote (5833)	11/18/1997 9:02:00 AM
From: Jon Tara	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13925

Chip, you have now made two slips of the tongue that suggest that you may actually be long, not short, or at least don't have any position at all. (If you had the position you claim to have, I don't think you would make these mistakes, as you would be focused on your position, at least enough so to know which way the stock has to go for you to make a profit.) I let the first one slide. In describing your "short" position of a few days ago, you indicated that you "sold higher", thus profiting from your "short"! Now, today, you suggest a "switch from supply to demand" being reflected in the charts. This would be a positive for the stock, and would tend to make it rise, not fall, and thus does not support your short position.