Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (622357)	8/1/2011 11:37:22 AM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578884

No they don't disagree with me. * And if they did they would be wrong. Nothing in Social Security law, or in the constitution, or in court decisions, considers projected/planned future entitlement spending to be debt or contractual obligation. Legally if it isn't a debt or a contractual obligation default isn't an issue. In any case as I've already pointed out the feds have more than enough money to pay both interest and Social Security. * - Of course you can find a few examples who let their partisanship overwhelm their attention to truth, but many of them are just self proclaimed experts.