SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Obama - Clinton Disaster -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tonto who wrote (54519)8/1/2011 3:39:04 PM
From: John1 Recommendation  Respond to of 103300
 
...the savings across the state are beyond what most considered possible and the taxpayers are benefiting from this...

You've struck on an important theme that I have lobbied in favor of for a while, Tonto.

The entire issue of controlling spending should not fall onto the relatively small contingent of elected representatives, whether the issue is federal, state, or local budgets.

Our government approaches the issue from the top, when it should approach the problem from close to the bottom, as follows.

Step 1. Congress should determine how much money will be available for spending each year, without creating a deficit. You know -- like you, I, and millions of other Americans have to do each year without fail!

Step 2. Congress should have their budget teams work to define and allocate the appropriate percentages of the budget to the existing infrastructure. Please note that changes to the existing infrastructure, such as eliminating departments, is a separate issue that must be addressed independently. For example, I think that the Department of Education and the Department of Energy should be eliminated, but that debate should not happen while the budget is allocated. Eliminations and consolidations should happen annually before the budget is worked on.

Step 3. The directors who report to the departments, which in turn report to Congress, should be directed to allocate spending within his or her organizations to reflect the money that is made available to them by Congress.

In other words, Congress must NOT ask directors how much they need. Congress must tell them how much they have to work with and force them to do their damned jobs of actually managing their organizations within the budgets provided! Directors who go over budget should be terminated -- and that does NOT mean "allowed to retire". It means that they must be FIRED for failing to do their jobs properly!

Imagine that! Accountability!



To: tonto who wrote (54519)8/2/2011 11:17:20 AM
From: OldAIMGuy2 Recommendations  Respond to of 103300
 
Re: WI's end of Collective Bargaining for State Employees...................

Thanks T, for the further confirmation. This is truly great news.

Best regards, Tom