Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alighieri who wrote (622389)	8/1/2011 1:54:03 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1579136

>> There is NO estimate that ever said that the unfunded liability for part D was 14T...i dare you to produce one. The infinite horizon expenditure of part D is estimated at 21T....and stop being your usual pedantic self... Let me put it this way. Whether it is 10T or 14T "unfunded liability" doesn't matter, because EITHER ONE is closer to accurate than your misunderstanding which was a "75 year expenditure". A 75 year expenditure would be a MUCH smaller unfunded liability, and a far more radically incorrect figure than any I may have given. In short, I may have cited an incorrect figure. YOU, OTOH, don't even get the concept.