SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: w sun who wrote (36221)11/18/1997 9:08:00 AM
From: Cameron Dorey  Respond to of 58324
 
Good morning, w, "iom will have the market for zip [snip] but seems giving up on middle to high-end removable storage..."

You know, this is one factor that I seem to perceive differently than a lot of people here. I just don't think there is that much of a need (read: market) for BIG removable storage, at least where mainline computer apps are involved (sure, let's put Gone with the Wind on a disk, search for the sound bite, "Frankly, my dear, I don't give a da**" but that's not what I call mainline computing). When do you need GB of removable storage? I submit, primarily when you have a catastrophic crash. What's wrong with a $20 (Ditto) tape, calmly backing up at 1:03 AM, when even most people here are sleeping? OK, some folks need big high-speed removables, no doubt, but just how many?

One more question, isn't there still a 2+ GB limit on the size of disk partitions in Windows (or did that disappear with the latest revision, which nobody but new computer buyers can get)? If so, why get a removable bigger than 2+ GB? Just backup one partition at a time. What good is a 4.7 GB removable if you have to subdivide it into partitions before you use it for backup/restore?

That's enough for now from this Luddite. Stand firm, make money.

Cameron

"This site best viewed with a browser which supports tables, chairs, and sofa beds."



To: w sun who wrote (36221)11/18/1997 1:49:00 PM
From: Brendan2012  Respond to of 58324
 
>>iom's success is mostly due to its excellent execution of zip. but the mistakes in ls-120...<<

I would say (and did say then) that LS-120 was DOA actually...I don't think there were major mistakes made, just that Zip technology was better. Remember IOM sold floptical technology.

Brendan