SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: MJ who wrote (306426)8/3/2011 12:12:47 PM
From: joseffyRespond to of 306849
 
Bank of Illegal Aliens in America
....................................................................................................................................
By Michelle Malkin • February 13, 2007 09:21 AM

Higher standards…except for illegal aliens

Bank of America has introduced a new credit especially and exclusively for law-breaking immigrants. Really. The story is on the front page of the Wall Street Journal today. It’s subscription-only. Here are the details:

In the latest sign of the U.S. banking industry’s aggressive pursuit of the Hispanic market, Bank of America Corp. has quietly begun offering credit cards to customers without Social Security numbers — typically illegal immigrants.

In recent years, banks across the country have begun offering checking accounts and, in some cases, mortgages to the nation’s fast-growing ranks of undocumented immigrants, most of whom are Hispanic. But these immigrants generally haven’t been able to get major credit cards, making it hard for them to develop a credit history and expand their purchasing power.

The new Bank of America program is open to people who lack both a Social Security number and a credit history, as long as they have held a checking account with the bank for three months without an overdraft. Most adults in the U.S. who don’t have a Social Security number are undocumented immigrants.

The Charlotte, N.C., banking giant tested the program last year at five branches in Los Angeles, and last week expanded it to 51 branches in Los Angeles County, home to the largest concentration of illegal immigrants in the U.S. The bank hopes to roll out the program nationally later this year.

The banking giant salivating over the massive illegal alien market insists it’s doing nothing wrong:

Bank of America defends the program, saying it complies with U.S. banking and antiterrorism laws. Company executives say that the initiative isn’t about politics, but rather about meeting the needs of an untapped group of potential customers.

“These people are coming here for quality of life, and they deserve somebody to give them a chance to achieve that quality of life,” says Brian Tuite, the bank’s director of Latin America card operations and one of the architects of the program.

BoA is defying federal immigration laws:

1907 Title 8, U.S.C. § 1324(a) Offenses

Title 8, U.S.C. § 1324(a) defines several distinct offenses related to aliens. Subsection 1324(a)(1)(i)-(v) prohibits alien smuggling, domestic transportation of unauthorized aliens, concealing or harboring unauthorized aliens, encouraging or inducing unauthorized aliens to enter the United States, and engaging in a conspiracy or aiding and abetting any of the preceding acts. Subsection 1324(a)(2) prohibits bringing or attempting to bring unauthorized aliens to the United States in any manner whatsoever, even at a designated port of entry. Subsection 1324(a)(3).

Encouraging/Inducing — Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv) makes it an offense for any person who — encourages or induces an alien to come to, enter, or reside in the United States, knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that such coming to, entry, or residence is or will be in violation of law.

Conspiracy/Aiding or Abetting — Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(v) expressly makes it an offense to engage in a conspiracy to commit or aid or abet the commission of the foregoing offenses.

Penalties — The basic statutory maximum penalty for violating 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(i) and (v)(I) (alien smuggling and conspiracy) is a fine under title 18, imprisonment for not more than 10 years, or both. With regard to violations of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(ii)-(iv) and (v)(ii), domestic transportation, harboring, encouraging/inducing, or aiding/abetting, the basic statutory maximum term of imprisonment is 5 years, unless the offense was committed for commercial advantage or private financial gain, in which case the maximum term of imprisonment is 10 years. In addition, significant enhanced penalties are provided for in violations of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1) involving serious bodily injury or placing life in jeopardy. Moreover, if the violation results in the death of any person, the defendant may be punished by death or by imprisonment for any term of years. The basic penalty for a violation of subsection 1324(a)(2) is a fine under title 18, imprisonment for not more than one year, or both, 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2)(A). Enhanced penalties are provided for violations involving bringing in criminal aliens, 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2)(B)(i), offenses done for commercial advantage or private financial gain, 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2)(B)(ii), and violations where the alien is not presented to an immigration officer immediately upon arrival, 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2)(B)(iii). A mandatory minimum three year term of imprisonment applies to first or second violations of § 1324(a)(2)(B)(i) or (B)(ii). Further enhanced punishment is provided for third or subsequent offenses.

online.wsj.com



To: MJ who wrote (306426)8/3/2011 12:42:30 PM
From: joseffyRespond to of 306849
 
"This is a huge untapped market with people that live and work in this country and are capable of buying homes to realize the American dream," said Chan Peterson, executive vice president and head of community banking at Banco Popular, one of the earliest banks to enter this field.

http://money.cnn.com/2005/08/08/news/economy/illegal_immigrants/



To: MJ who wrote (306426)8/3/2011 12:44:15 PM
From: joseffyRespond to of 306849
 
Illegal Immigrants Good Mortgage Risk Says NPR

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=17597739



To: MJ who wrote (306426)8/3/2011 12:47:10 PM
From: joseffyRespond to of 306849
 
Despite the accusations that what they're doing is illegal, Citigroup and Acorn stand by the program.

Acorn issued a statement saying everything about their program is legal. They say in the United States, it is perfectly legal for non-citizens to own property.

http://abclocal.go.com/kfsn/story?section=news/local&id=3649553



To: MJ who wrote (306426)8/3/2011 12:51:21 PM
From: joseffyRespond to of 306849
 
MORTGAGES FOR ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS
............................................................................................
by: Dean Foust on July 30, 2007
http://www.businessweek.com/the_thread/hotproperty/archives/2007/07/mortgages_for_illegal_immigrants.html

Bank of America kicked up a stink when it came to light several months ago that it had been quietly testing a credit card in California that didn’t require an applicant to possess a Social Security number, which was tacit acknowledgement that BofA was marketing the card to illegal immigrants.

Now comes a story in The Charlotte Observer that a number of banks (not including BofA, however) are experimenting with mortgages in which the lenders accept Individual Taxpayer Identification Numbers on loan applications in lieu of Social Security numbers. The Observer notes that the IRS issues so-called “ITINs” solely to process tax payments, regardless of immigration status. These mortgages are starting to take off. The National Association of Hispanic Real Estate Professionals believes that the ITIN mortgage market could reach $80 million, and already Wall Street has begun to buy ITIN loans and bundle them into mortgage-backed securities for sale to pension funds and other institutional investors.

Not surprisingly, the critics are already out, calling for an end to mortage financing for illegal workers. According to the Observer:

Critics, however, insist banks should accept only verified documents that can be obtained by U.S. citizens and legal residents. William Gheen, head of Raleigh-based Americans for Legal Immigration PAC, earlier this year launched a boycott against Bank of America over its credit card program."It's against federal law to induce an illegal alien to enter the U.S. and aid and abet them staying in the country," he said.

In the last session of Congress, a Republican congresswoman from Banner Elk, Rep. Virginia Foxx, introduced a bill that would require federal agencies that insure mortgage loans to check Social Security numbers of applicants. Foxx's spokesman said she opposes the use of ITINs for loans and plans to bring the bill back up again.

I tend to side with the pro-immigrant experts like Tim Ready at the University of Notre Dame, who argues that "It's really important to the economy as a whole and to the real estate market in particular that Latinos be able to purchase a home." You can't have individuals mow your lawns, bus your tables at a restaurant, clean your houses, and not allow them the chance to own their slice of the American dream. Besides, the housing market needs all the help it can get these days.

My BusinessWeek colleague Brian Grow authored a really insightful cover story ("Embracing Illegals," July 18, 2005) on the conflict between government--who by law must deport illegal workers--and Corporate America, which in their quest for growth, has aggressively been marketing to undocumented workers in recent years (not to mention employing them, but that's another story). You can read Brian's story here.



To: MJ who wrote (306426)8/3/2011 1:00:58 PM
From: joseffyRespond to of 306849
 
Dozens of small banks in Illinois, Texas and other states have recently begun offering home loans to illegal immigrants, and big banks including Wells Fargo & Co. and Bank of America Corp. are planning to launch their own programs in the near future.

archive.newsmax.com



To: MJ who wrote (306426)8/3/2011 1:02:31 PM
From: joseffyRespond to of 306849
 
Feds Encouraging Illegal Aliens to Get Mortgages

archive.newsmax.com



To: MJ who wrote (306426)8/3/2011 1:10:42 PM
From: joseffyRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 306849
 
Undocumented residents being recruited for loans

Home-buying program has cash, controversy

By Janine Zúñiga San Diego Union
February 6, 2006 signonsandiego.com

A major U.S. bank has funded its first home loans to undocumented Mexican immigrants in San Diego County in a move that targets a lucrative, wide-open market while providing new grist for the debate over illegal immigration. The local program, which uses tax identification numbers instead of Social Security numbers, is similar to programs run by small lenders – and two state agencies – around the country that have distributed millions of dollars to undocumented immigrants over the past few years. “There is a huge untapped market out there, but it is a controversial program,” said Sarah Lumbert, office director of San Diego's ACORN Housing Corp., part of a national group working with Citibank to provide tax-ID loans. ACORN members, advocates on housing issues for low-and moderate-income people and Citibank have quietly recruited applicants in the county for more than a year. Their program has ramped up slowly because applicants need to establish credit and hunt for an affordable home.

But the market is vast and the level of interest in the program is high, especially since the loans typically offer below-market interest rates, down-payment assistance and require no mortgage insurance. The Pew Hispanic Center estimated that 10.3 million undocumented immigrants were living in the United States as of March 2004. And a study that year for the San Diego-based National Association of Hispanic Real Estate Professionals concluded that nearly 216,000 undocumented immigrants could become homeowners if they had better access to the home-buying process, collectively acquiring an estimated $44 billion in mortgages.

Although there are no reliable estimates of the number of undocumented residents in San Diego County, Latinos make up 29 percent of the population, according to the U.S. Census Bureau. In South County, that figure is 54 percent. About one-quarter of homes in South County are owned by Latinos, according to 2000 census figures. Only two tax-ID mortgages have been processed locally, but about 10 local Citibank loans to undocumented immigrants may soon be finalized with the help of ACORN, the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now. The nonprofit organization receives much of its funding from the Department of Housing and Urban Development. Tax-ID numbers are used by those who need to report federal taxes but are not eligible for a Social Security number, usually because they are undocumented. Until the past few years, lenders would not – and most still do not – accept anything but a Social Security number for home loans. Wells Fargo recently seized on the market, joining Citibank as the only nationwide banks offering tax-ID loans. Wells Fargo started its pilot tax-ID loan program in Los Angeles and Orange counties in December. Chuck Lemoine, a Wells Fargo senior vice president, said providing tax-ID loans is legal and that reaching out “is not only the right thing to do, it's good business.”



Estela, the first to secure a local loan, is a house cleaner from Mexico City. She has lived, worked and paid taxes in San Diego County for 13 years but has no legal right to be here. However, Estela does have a tax-ID number. ACORN Housing officials disclosed her identity to The San Diego Union-Tribune on the condition her full name not be used. Six years ago, Estela asked an American friend to help her buy a home. She paid the costs, his name was on the loan and title. But a tax lien frightened her friend, who transferred the title to Estela. When the mortgage company found out she was an illegal immigrant, it demanded full payment. Estela thought she would have to sell her three-bedroom home or lose it. That is, until she heard about the tax-ID loan program. In October, Estela signed the final documents for a new mortgage issued by Citibank. The local tax-ID program has kept a low profile – no Citibank or ACORN-issued news releases – because of the anti-immigrant backlash that the overall program has drawn.

Citibank has processed 72 tax-ID loans nationally since October 2004, half in California. ACORN officials sponsor weekly workshops at their City Heights office. Their counselors knock on doors promoting the program. “A lot of people think they can't apply. So we've done a lot of outreach,” Lumbert said. “The people in the program so far have been very persistent about getting things done.” Often, family members pool resources to afford the county's pricey market. With Citibank, as many as eight people can sign for a mortgage. As passionate as real estate professionals are about the program, critics are just as passionate in attacking it.

“We're seriously looking at getting these banks charged with aiding and abetting someone who's a criminal,” said William Gheen, president of the national group Americans for Legal Immigration. “Illegal aliens are criminals.” Gheen says the program encourages illegal immigration. And Americans, he argues, are losing loans to undocumented immigrants. “It's highly offensive to our legal citizens who have to jump through hoops with their credit files to get home loans and they're giving loans to people who have no credit whatsoever,” Gheen said. Rob Paral, a research fellow with the Immigration Policy Center of the American Immigration Law Foundation, a Washington, D.C.-based nonprofit, prepared the 2004 loan study for the Hispanic real estate group. He said critics might legitimately say that banks with tax-ID programs are condoning illegal immigration but doesn't believe legal residents are losing loans. “There is no displacement of credit from natives to immigrants,” Paral said. “Banks have plenty of money to loan.” Some fault the federal government for sending inconsistent messages. On one hand, they say, the government is trying to step up measures to curb illegal immigration. The U.S. House of Representatives passed legislation in December to build 700 miles of fencing along the U.S.-Mexico border. The same measure would require mandatory detention of illegal immigrants and increase penalties for employers who hire them. The legislation was referred to a Senate committee in January.

On the other hand, there has been no movement by Washington lawmakers to put a stop to the tax-ID loans, and the government routinely issues tax-ID numbers. The IRS has issued such numbers since 1996 to foreigners to encourage them, regardless of their immigration status, to file tax returns. There is nothing illegal about the loans. Congress has passed a series of fair-lending acts, similar to the 1977 Community Reinvestment Act, that ensure equal access to mortgages for low-income and minority households. The law does not require banks to check immigration status, Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. spokesman David Barr said. “We don't encourage banks to reach out to undocumented immigrants,” he said.

“But through the Community Reinvestment Act, they must reach out to minority groups, and a large part of that group is the Hispanic population and many are new arrivals to this country.” Citibank and ACORN Housing offer the program in Miami; New York City; Jersey City, N.J.; Baltimore; Washington, D.C.; Chicago; Bridgeport, Conn., and at all of ACORN Housing's 12 California offices. Smaller lenders have taken the lead with the loans in at least nine states. Housing agencies in two states also have taken part, prompting backlashes there. The Wisconsin Housing and Economic Development Authority has issued 242 tax-ID loans worth $27 million since March 2004. That spurred two measures, pending in the Wisconsin Senate and Assembly, that would prohibit the housing authority from funding home mortgages without Social Security numbers. A similar state-backed program in Illinois was announced in December. Critics plan to introduce legislation to stop it.



On a Saturday morning last fall, about a dozen people attended a Spanish-language, first-time home-buyers class at ACORN's local office. Organizers told participants many banks are willing to work with applicants who have little or no credit. Many will accept nontraditional records of credit, such as utility payments and documentation of private loan payments. Applicants are told to put their cash in a bank account. Lumbert of the San Diego ACORN office said it is common for immigrants – many of whom bring a distrust of banks from their home countries – to keep hundreds, if not thousands, of dollars at home. Lumbert said one man had a bank statement showing a few thousand dollars, but he said he had more at home. When she asked how much, he said $40,000. Many undocumented immigrants have been in the United States for years, even decades. Most live with family members who are legally in the United States. “There are many undocumented immigrants who are pretty well-integrated into American society, who have lived here a long time and have a decent income,” said Paral, who conducted the 2004 loan study. Estela is one of them. Her story is common among undocumented immigrants who buy homes: They buy property with someone who has documents or use fake Social Security numbers and names. Estela, a divorced mother of two, has worked since 1992 as a house cleaner in Del Mar and, later, in Rancho Santa Fe. Six years ago, her American friend used $24,000 of Estela's money to buy a South County home. In July, a $12,000 lien was placed on the home because of unpaid back property taxes. The friend transferred the title to Estela. At the time, the mortgage had a balance of $140,000.

Estela acknowledges not paying tax bills for two years, saying she didn't receive them. When Countrywide Home Loans found out about the title change, it offered to give Estela a loan but it required a Social Security number. Estela had 75 days to come up with $152,000, the loan balance plus the back taxes. After frantic calls for help, Estela found ACORN Housing. She received a 30-year fixed mortgage at 5 percent interest, 1 percentage point lower than the standard rate. It costs $780 a month. Estela's home was appraised at $565,000. Paral said lenders that provide loans to undocumented immigrants are taking a risk, considering the threat that leaseholders might be deported. Additionally, banks can't sell the loans on the secondary market to Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac, as they can other loans, because the two mortgage companies only handle loans for legal residents and U.S. citizens. Anecdotal evidence suggests the loans so far have been successful, Paral said. The owner of a small savings and loan in Chicago told him his tax-ID loans are his safest. “It's emotional,” Paral said. “When you're coming from a place where banks don't lend money and you are given the opportunity, you safeguard it and respect it.” Estela's 26-year-old son, who has a two-year biotechnology degree from a community college and works as a waiter, said the family moved from Mexico to San Diego County 16 years ago. His sister is now in her third year of law school in Northern California. He can't believe they own a home.

“Like I was telling my mom, some people come here and abuse the system,” he said. “My mom never applied for welfare or anything. She's worked and paid taxes. I think people who don't get in any trouble should be given an opportunity to own a home. I'm just glad we found someone to give us that opportunity.” Union-Tribune library researcher Danielle Cervantes contributed to this report.



To: MJ who wrote (306426)8/4/2011 5:49:28 PM
From: joseffyRespond to of 306849
 
Documents: ACORN and Project Vote Activity Led to Dramatic Increase in Invalid Colorado Voter Registrations for 2008 and 2010

Percentage of Invalid Voter Registrations from Public Assistance Agencies in Colorado More Than Four Times the National Average in 2009-2010; Sought “Legislative Fix” to allow People without a Driver’s License or State Identification to Register to Vote Online


Washington, DC -- August 4, 2011

Judicial Watch ^ | August 4, 2011
judicialwatch.org

Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, announced today that it uncovered documents from the Colorado Department of State showing that ACORN and its affiliate, Project Vote, successfully pressured Colorado officials to implement new policies for increasing the registration of public assistance recipients during the 2008 and 2010 election seasons. Following the policy changes, the percentage of invalid voter registration forms from Colorado public assistance agencies was four times the national average. The documents, obtained pursuant to a June 8, 2011, Colorado Open Records Act request to the Colorado Office of the Secretary of State, include approximately 400 internal emails.

They relate to a complaint by ACORN and Project Vote that the state of Colorado was in violation of Section 7 of the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA). Under Section 7, states are required to offer voter registration services at all public assistance agencies, including unemployment offices and food stamp offices.

As a result of this collaboration between ACORN, Project Vote and Colorado officials, the number of voter registrations at Colorado public assistance agencies rose from 3,340 in 2007 to almost 44,000 in 2010. (In a February 15, 2011, email to Project Vote, Christi Heppard, Special Projects Coordinator for the Elections Division of the Colorado Department of State, wrote, “…I think you will be pleasantly surprised by the numbers.”) However, the collaboration also led to a large number of invalid and duplicate voter registrations. A total of 8% of rejected registration forms came from public assistance agencies in Colorado in 2009-2010.

This is more than four times the national average of 1.9% for that same time period. According to the documents, Amy Busefink, who at the time was under indictment on 13 voter registration violation charges in Nevada, stemming from her time as regional deputy director for ACORN, later she managed the online program for Project Vote nationally,

including Colorado. In a May 14, 2008, “pre-litigation” letter, ACORN and Project Vote complained to the State of Colorado that it was in violation of the NVRA, and subsequently set up a meeting with Colorado officials to discuss the matter. According to the documents, that meeting took place on July 2, 2008, at ACORN’s offices.

On June 9, 2009, not satisfied with Colorado’s response, Project Vote election counsel Donald Wine II threatened litigation: “CDHS [Colorado Department of Human Services] has had a year and a half to comply with the NVRA. We are left with no choice but to prepare for litigation.” In response to this threat, the Colorado Office of the Secretary of State evidently went to extreme measures to accommodate ACORN and Project Vote’s demands, including: Project Vote’s Busefink ultimately entered an Alford plea to two gross misdemeanor counts of conspiracy to commit the crime of compensation for registration of voters. (An Alford plea is a guilty plea, where the defendant does not admit the act and asserts innocence, but admits that sufficient evidence exists with which the prosecution could likely convince a judge or jury to find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.)

Democrat Bernie Buescher, who served as Colorado Secretary of State from January 2009 through January 2011, received support from the Secretary of State Project, an organization funded in part by liberal financier George Soros and organized by the leftist group Moveon.org.

(In April 2010, Buescher campaigned with former State House Speaker Terrance Carroll for a proposed bill that would have implemented universal mail-in balloting, same-day voter registrations and pre-registration of 16 year olds. Facing stiff opposition from county election clerks, the bill was tabled on April 21, 2010.) According to the documents, while Colorado officials took measures to satisfy the demands of Project Vote related to the registration of public assistance recipients, Buescher sought a waiver from the Obama administration that would allow a delay in sending out ballots in time for the military to vote in the last election.

The Department of Defense rejected the request. “The ACORN/Project Vote gang has not gone away, and continues to help generate fraudulent voter registrations that can lead to voter fraud. These emails clearly demonstrate that the corrupt organization ACORN/Project Vote had an inappropriate level of influence over the electoral process in Colorado,” said Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton. “Colorado officials bent over backwards to abide by the demands of ACORN/Project Vote, which was helped to run by an activist facing criminal charges. So it comes as no surprise that there was a sharp increase in voter registration irregularities. And it is shameful that the concern for voting rights of the citizens of Colorado did not apparently extend to military personnel in the state. If we’re going to protect the integrity of the 2012 elections, attention must be paid to the continuing nefarious activities of ACORN/Project Vote.” Documents Uncovered