Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Chesapeake Gold (CKG.V) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TheSlowLane who wrote (5844)	8/3/2011 4:53:34 PM
From: marcos	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7833

Message 26786981 - yup, probably got some the same day, there were a whole bunch of fills one to six board lots in size, juggling nine or ten active accts at the time if memory serves ... now only seven really, consulting on two, and let one go dormant for long-term keepers Allocation is kind of a personal thing, but putting an upper limit on cost of a single position seems obviously important, my limit has always been one-eighth of pf which is twelve and a half per cent which is pretty close to ten ... rarely exceeded except when pf was radically slimmed down due to cash calls off-market - once i had near fifty per cent of pf in mmg which tanked for twenty per cent, but it was not a major serious amount of money as i'd cleaned everything else out for property ... it also came back to a gain just in time for another cash call, which was nice Right now ort/a.v is a hair short of twelve per cent of main acct ... and underwater by seventeen cents as well, aargh