Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics of Energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RetiredNow who wrote (27412)	8/5/2011 8:07:39 AM
From: RetiredNow	Respond to of 86356

Thread, looks like expanding offshore drilling is making progress. Slow, but progress nonetheless... U.S. agency approves Shell Arctic oil drilling planRoyal Dutch Shell's long-stymied Arctic drilling program inched ahead on Thursday, as the U.S. offshore drilling regulator approved the company's oil exploration plan for Alaska's Beaufort Sea. \| August 4, 2011 ShareEmail Print By Ayesha Rascoe WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Royal Dutch Shell's long-stymied Arctic drilling program inched ahead on Thursday, as the U.S. offshore drilling regulator approved the company's oil exploration plan for Alaska's Beaufort Sea. Shell's plan would allow the company to drill up to four shallow water exploratory wells off Alaska's northern coast beginning in July 2012. The approval comes more than a year after BP's massive oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico upended Obama administration plans to expand offshore drilling and underscores the White House's plan to streamline permitting for Alaska drilling. While this is a step forward in Shell's push to tap the Arctic's vast oil and gas reserves, the oil giant still has a long way to go before it can begin carrying out its ambitious drilling plans. The conditional approval of the exploration plan is contingent upon Shell receiving permits from other government agencies, including the Environmental Protection Agency and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. "The conditional approval of our Revised Beaufort Sea Plan of Exploration is welcome news and adds to our cautious optimism that we will be drilling our Alaska leases this time next year," Shell spokeswoman Kelly op de Weegh said. Opposition from local and environmental groups and regulatory delays have so far hindered Shell from developing offshore Alaska leases the company began picking up in 2005. A plan to drill at least one Beaufort Sea well this year was scuttled by the revocation of a key air-quality permit. CONSIDERING LEGAL OPTIONS Global warming has lowered summer sea ice levels in the Arctic, increasing access for oil and gas developers, but also stoking sovereignty disputes over resources among the countries bordering the Arctic. Environmental groups say the risks of oil production in the Arctic could be too great, however, arguing that an oil spill would have devastating consequences for the fragile ecosystem. The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, which regulates offshore drilling, stressed that Shell will have to meet rigorous standards imposed after last year's spill before the agency approves any permits actually to begin drilling. "We will closely review and monitor Shell's proposed activities to ensure that any activities that take place under this plan will be conducted in a safe and environmentally responsible manner," said Michael Bromwich, head of the drilling agency. Environmental groups expressed outrage at the government's decision. Erik Grafe, a staff attorney for Earthjustice, said environmentalists are considering their legal options. "We're reviewing the agency's analyses to the extent they exist and we're making decisions based on that review of the analysis," Grafe said. There is a 60-day window for filing a legal challenge to the approval, he added. In addition to its Beaufort exploration plan, Shell submitted a plan to drill up to six wells in the Chukchi Sea in 2012 and 2013.

To: RetiredNow who wrote (27412)	8/5/2011 9:46:15 AM
From: Eric	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 86356

The battery has been broken down and the costs of the components tallied and it comes to around $10K. The rest of the car is pretty standard fare. So I'm pretty sure they are making a profit at these prices. Battery costs are dropping rapidly along with improved capacity and life. Current Tesla Roadster customers are being offered a spare battery pack for around $12,000 now. That's significantly cheaper than what was originally put in the car when production began three years ago. And that's a 54 Kwhr pack, much greater capacity than the Leaf.