SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Paul V. who wrote (110091)8/8/2011 11:28:32 AM
From: steve harris3 Recommendations  Respond to of 224729
 
You have to say at least Obama is consistent.

Tarbaby believes raising the debt limit will lower the debt, rising unemployment will lower the unemployment rate, a drilling moratorium in the gulf will reduce our dependence upon foreign oil, and shutting down the economy will get it growing again...



To: Paul V. who wrote (110091)8/8/2011 12:42:29 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie7 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224729
 
"I agree with you that the TEA PARTY made a big mistake"

you know what is hilarious? The TEA PARTY isn't even a real "party". Can you name one politician who listed their party as "TEA" on the ballot?

Do you remember when nancy pelosi called the TEA PARTY gatherings "astroturf"? From astroturf to controlling congress, and yet....who is the head of the TEA PARTY?

The TEA PARTY was only a failure becase they have failed to put the correct label on the progressives that have driven this great country into the ground. PROGRESSIVES ARE PARASITES. They have been living off their host (the citizens of this great country) while ridiculing them.

Until the stranglehold that the PROGRESSIVE PARASITES have on the democrat party is released, the job of the TEA PARTY PATRIOTS will not be done.

It's time to starve the PROGRESSIVE PARASITES by cutting taxes and reducing spending.

(hey, this capslock thing is cool)



To: Paul V. who wrote (110091)8/8/2011 12:43:21 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie7 Recommendations  Respond to of 224729
 
Did I mention that the DEMOCRATS are PROGRESSIVE PARASITES



To: Paul V. who wrote (110091)8/8/2011 12:52:59 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie4 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224729
 
Do you think that the democrats would complain that we are using too much violent rhetoric if we showed Obama and Pelosi with vampire fangs dripping blood as they sucked the life out of the American people?

I mean, if we did use that kind of violent rhetoric, another Jared Lee Loughner might try to sprinkle them with holy water and serve them garlic.

I think that showing the PROGRESSIVE PARASITIC DEMOCRATS as giant blood sucking leeches is a little bit more effective than the DEMOCRATS are BLOOD SUCKING VAMPIRES. What do you think?

or are DEMOCRATS really just PARASITIC DISEASE CARRYING FLEAS?

Although, this kind of works...

IT'S TIME TO DRIVE A STAKE THROUGH THE HEART OF THE BLOOD SUCKING DEMOCRAT SPENDING MACHINE

or too much violent rhetoric? maybe some crazy mofo will try to drive an actual stake through a BLOOD SUCKING DEMOCRAT politician if they read that