SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: bentway who wrote (623801)8/10/2011 2:34:42 PM
From: steve harris  Respond to of 1577868
 
You left out that the US has the second highest corporate tax rates in the world.

Not to mention half of Americans don't pay income taxes at all.



To: bentway who wrote (623801)8/10/2011 3:03:48 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1577868
 
Bentway, > They manage the useful idiots by shrilly screaming "We're not going to let them raise YOUR taxes!", while knowing full well that only the 1% of their supporters that pay for them are the ONLY one's that would be affected.

Wrong again.

super-economy.blogspot.com

> Over ten years, the deficit is expected by the CBO to be about $13 trillion dollars. Repealing the Bush tax cuts on the rich as President Obama proposes will raise $0.7 trillion. Repealing *all* Bush tax cuts would raise $3.3 trillion.

Tenchusatsu



To: bentway who wrote (623801)8/10/2011 5:02:10 PM
From: TimF1 Recommendation  Respond to of 1577868
 
Tax revenue as a percentage of GDP is low (compared to recent decades, not in any absolute sense) because the economy is so soft, not because of the rates or tax structure. Any solid sustained recovery would put tax revenue above the modern norm even without any tax increases.

Also spending and tax revenue should be lower as a percentage of GDP. As a country gets richer it might choose to spend more, but government spending doesn't need to keep up with the growth of the economy. The economy growing, people getting richer, means less government is required not more. In real per capita terms current tax revenue is not low compared to the past, and by any measure federal spending is very high compared to the past, the problem is too much spending, not a lack of revenue.



To: bentway who wrote (623801)8/10/2011 7:33:56 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1577868
 
Does the US burden of 24% include

- Federal and state income taxes?
- Social Security & Medicare taxes?
- State sales & use taxes?
- Personal Property taxes?
- Excise taxes, including the tax on gasoline?
- License & Occupational fees?
- Unemployment taxes paid by employers (which are effectively paid by its customers)?
- Estate taxes?

These comparisons are idiotic.