Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : Ligand (LGND) Breakout! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Henry Niman who wrote (11373)	11/18/1997 9:03:00 PM
From: Hippieslayer	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 32384

I'm not doing this to be confrontational or because I dislike you. I have made it clear as to what I think about you in prior posts. I'm doing this to merely back up my objection to your fast an lose use of unprovable info. You, like all of us, have to show some type of accountability for what you type. I will use your own posts to make my case. It's in some of these posts below that you should have shown some restraint in what you dangled before us. In some, you should have admitted that you didn't have your facts straight. exchange2000.com If you're willing to tell us that three articles are coming out, why not tell us in what journals? exchange2000.com another speculation but based on what? Your gut feeling or your source? exchange2000.com here you change from expect to see the articles soon. Which they might appear tomorrow but it when they appear in press is when you should let us know. exchange2000.com What source, henry? In one post, your source gives you info, but in 10844 you don't mention your source. Did your source tell you the articles would be coming out the following week or did you just assume this based on what your source told you. Which one is it Henry? Is your source bad or is your "specific schedule(10844)" that is bad. exchange2000.com I'm not the only one who asked you, "Show me the articles" What does your source say now? Do you still talk to him/her? What's his/her explanation as to why his/her original info didn't pan out. Inquiring minds would like to know? Henry, I think these are valid points to call you on. And since most on this thread seems to be complacent on this issue( with the exception of two others), what about the questions posed to you by Courtney in 11270? Her questions are very straight forward. I can tell you that I'm able to post regularly because I'm on the internet due to my job. And I respect your right not to answer.