Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J.L. who wrote (27370)	11/18/1997 12:23:00 PM
From: Proton	Respond to of 35569

Re: AZDOM On another front; Is it not about time for a public apology from the State of Arizona and it's employees... About time for IPM to turn the screws on them now. IMO, IPM has no leverage to turn the screws on anyone right now. The difference between "no gold" and "no commercially extractable gold" will be lost on most people, including judges and jurors. A good attorney can, at this point, make IPM look perfectly foolish. Make no mistake, IPM, Furlong, and Doyle will be on trial, not AZDOM and its bureaucrats. This may change later. It may not. I believe that they are as responsable as anyone for the large negative perception this company has. I can think of one entity that has created more negative perception: siliconinvestor.com I recall all the derision and condescension the "public relations matter" crowd got a few months ago. Too bad my credulity trumped my perspicacity. "Cognitive dissonance" may explain much of my bad humour over the past month or so. Pý p.s. I have an e-mail in to IPM. My expectations that they will show up on the FAQ web page are low. My expectations for satisfactory answers are even lower.