Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TobagoJack who wrote (77624)	8/12/2011 1:15:37 PM
From: Maurice Winn	3 Recommendations Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 219762

Therefore there was no reason to humour them or do other than defeat them as mercifully as possible. There was no validity in their crimes, they were just simple crimes. That means create great fear in them as effectively as possible. Make them sure of being caught and certain of being punished - hey presto, they will cease and desist. It's not often you admit you were were wrong. But it's nice to see. Some people, most even, have difficulty admitting they were wrong. Well done for changing your mind from thinking the revolting rioters were the same as the Arabs revolting. They were qualitatively different. Just as slaves revolting against captivity would be different from the Peckham criminals. Saddam Hussein was not just another politician like David Cameron. Congratulations on seeing the light. Mqurice