To: TEDennis who wrote (3335 ) 11/18/1997 1:02:00 PM From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 10786
TEDennis, if you think the TED-effect is bad, just take a gander at the Tech-effect: [Note: I wrote this yesterday, decided not to post it, but was urged to do so by several people. Prices are current as of yesterday]11/11/97techstocks.com While waiting for Quantum to come around, I'd short Yahoo. This stock is tumbling, and MM's are dumping shares left and right. The SI Yahoo group is bearish as well. Look for a drop to low 30's or even high 20's. By then Quantum sellers may be done. Tech 11/12/97techstocks.com Yahoo will go below $40 tomorrow. Without a doubt. There are 33 sellers for every ten buyers....no one wants to own an overvalued stock right now when you can buy a discounted stock somewhere else. See ya, Yahoo. Yahoo. Yahoo. That's the sound it makes when it flushes down the toilet to $30. I hope Yahoo longs can get out before it's too late. Tech While waiting at 27 for Quantum to "come around", it has jumped to 30, a 10% blunder in just four days. Yahoo is now trading at 50, a 25% blunder in just three days. And what about the stocks Tech goes long in? Why, what about CSGI... techstocks.com 10/8/97 Robert - I think that we should be able to move towards the $13.50 to $14.00 level before any major resistance is felt. I think that the market currently has NO idea of the potential of this company and the huge margins they are bound to have. As more and more contracts are announced, we should see this run strengthen. On record as saying CSGI to 14, now at under 7. That's a whopping 50% blunder in just over a month. Oh, but there's more:techstocks.com 10/10/97 Ted, >>SPECIAL REQUEST CONCERNING ROBERT NEWTON<< I know that NETZ will be moved over $1.00 as soon as Mon. or Tues. I think it will be good for a few bucks tomorrow as well. It is only $.72 right now... NETZ immediately tanked to its present trading level of .27 . That's a 69% blunder in just over a month! As one might expect, Tech has tried to Monday Morning Quarterback his ego back to some shape. Like here, no one is buying it:techstocks.com 11/13/97 Since you shewed up you have contradicted yourself many times. You have no credibilty and therefore everyone would be well advised to absolutely ignore your posts. Cowboy Brett [Note: this is the last such post I will make on this subject. It was only meant to show newbies on this thread that anyone who goes out of their way to claim they are "right" is usually wrong most of the time.]