SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Information Architects (IARC): E-Commerce & EIP -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TEDennis who wrote (3335)11/18/1997 1:02:00 PM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 10786
 
TEDennis, if you think the TED-effect is bad, just take a gander at the Tech-effect:

[Note: I wrote this yesterday, decided not to post it, but was urged to do so by several people. Prices are current as of yesterday]

11/11/97
techstocks.com
While waiting for Quantum to come around, I'd short Yahoo. This stock is tumbling, and MM's are dumping shares left and right. The SI Yahoo group is bearish as well. Look for a drop to low 30's or even high 20's. By then Quantum sellers may be done.
Tech

11/12/97
techstocks.com
Yahoo will go below $40 tomorrow. Without a doubt. There are 33 sellers for every ten buyers....no one wants to own an overvalued stock right now when you can buy a discounted stock somewhere else. See ya, Yahoo. Yahoo. Yahoo. That's the sound it makes when it flushes down the toilet to $30. I hope Yahoo longs can get out before it's too late.
Tech


While waiting at 27 for Quantum to "come around", it has jumped to 30, a 10% blunder in just four days. Yahoo is now trading at 50, a 25% blunder in just three days.

And what about the stocks Tech goes long in? Why, what about CSGI...

techstocks.com
10/8/97
Robert - I think that we should be able to move towards the
$13.50 to $14.00 level before any major resistance is felt.

I think that the market currently has NO idea of the potential of this company and the huge margins they are bound to have. As more and more contracts are announced, we should see this run strengthen.


On record as saying CSGI to 14, now at under 7. That's a whopping 50% blunder in just over a month.

Oh, but there's more:

techstocks.com
10/10/97
Ted, >>SPECIAL REQUEST CONCERNING ROBERT NEWTON<<

I know that NETZ will be moved over $1.00 as soon as Mon. or Tues. I think it will be good for a few bucks tomorrow as well.

It is only $.72 right now...


NETZ immediately tanked to its present trading level of .27. That's a 69% blunder in just over a month!

As one might expect, Tech has tried to Monday Morning Quarterback his ego back to some shape. Like here, no one is buying it:

techstocks.com
11/13/97
Since you shewed up you have contradicted yourself many times. You have no credibilty and therefore everyone would be well advised to absolutely ignore your posts.

Cowboy Brett


[Note: this is the last such post I will make on this subject. It was only meant to show newbies on this thread that anyone who goes out of their way to claim they are "right" is usually wrong most of the time.]



To: TEDennis who wrote (3335)11/19/1997 11:18:00 AM
From: Janice Shell  Respond to of 10786
 
TED--

From you, last night: Jeff: I've been considering doubling my investment in ALYD. That's the good news. The bad news is that I've been considering doubling my investment in ALYD.

Frightening. The Effect really never fails, does it? Now will you do something for me? Concentrate very very hard on the idea of shorting PFLAT...

Good think that--as CEO--there's no need for you actually to buy shares in FBN, or we'd all be in trouble...

Janice