SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : AMD:News, Press Releases and Information Only! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ali Chen who wrote (2311)11/18/1997 1:47:00 PM
From: Ali Chen  Respond to of 6843
 
Here is another thought, from local Intel-mind:

"Software Spiral, Intel Profits Both Stall"

chipanalyst.com

"Thus, not enough customers are buying Pentium II systems,
and Intel's ASP has sagged. In 1998, Intel plans to drop
Pentium II prices so low that customers will have to buy
them, but that won't do much to raise Intel's ASP."



To: Ali Chen who wrote (2311)11/18/1997 4:23:00 PM
From: Paul Engel  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 6843
 
Ali - Re: "Questioned about the supposed delivery shortages, Jochen Polster, General Manager of AMD in Germany, said that there have been no shortages with the OEMs (like Vobis). Only smaller customers had to wait for chips in the beginning. Meanwhile the production has been ramped up far enough, so AMD can deliver without any delays. The yield is supposedly also very good with the K6 processors. Almost all K6 chips from the current production are suitable for 200**MHz. The 233-MHz building blocks are not as sensitive regarding the power supply as the first series. Therefore AMD wants begin producing 266-MHz K6 chips for selected OEMs shortly. Initially these building blocks will not be available on the open market, however. "

Well, if yields ARE GOOD and AMD can't ship more than 1 or 1.5 million chips last quarter and this quarter, that would indicate that they don't have enough orders for their K6 chip.

You would reach the same conclusion, would you not?

Paul