SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Gorilla and King Portfolio candidates - Moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Uncle Frank who wrote (2863)8/15/2011 11:48:23 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 2955
 
Google to Buy Motorola Mobility for $12.5 Billion

bloomberg.com

By Brian Womack and Zachary Tracer - Aug 15, 2011 9:30 AM CT

Google Inc. (GOOG), maker of the Android mobile-phone software, agreed to buy smartphone maker Motorola Mobility Holdings Inc. for $12.5 billion in its biggest deal, gaining mobile patents and expanding in the hardware business.

Motorola shareholders will get $40 a share in cash, the companies said in a statement today. That’s 63 percent more than Motorola Mobility’s closing price on the New York Stock Exchange on Aug. 12. Both boards have approved the takeover.

Larry Page, Google’s co-founder who took over as chief executive officer in April, is transforming Google into a smartphone maker to take on Apple Inc. (AAPL)’s iPhone and gain more clout in the wireless business. Motorola Mobility, under pressure to seek strategic changes by activist investor Carl Icahn, gives Google more than 17,000 patents the company can leverage in negotiations with competitors such as Apple.

“This is the next step in building their position in the mobile world so they can distribute Google products and services through mobile phones and tablets,” said Clayton Moran, an analyst at Benchmark Co. in Boca Raton, Florida, who recommends Google shares. “They want a success with the Android platform and this will enhance their position in the mobile marketplace, as well as defend their position through the patent portfolio.”

Apple, which makes its own wireless software and hardware, briefly became the most valuable company in the world last week, helped by demand for the iPhone and the iPad tablet computer.

Motorola Mobility, based in Libertyville, Illinois, rose $13.92, or 57 percent, to $38.40 at 10:23 a.m. on the New York Stock Exchange. Google, based in Mountain View, California, fell $5.77, or 1 percent, to $558 on the Nasdaq Stock Market. InterDigital Inc., owner of mobile-phone patents that’s considering a sale, fell $14.87, or 20 percent, to $60.85.

‘Heck of a Premium’

Google is paying a premium of 73 percent compared with Motorola Mobility’s 20-day trading average price before today. The average premium of more than 360 deals in the wireless- equipment industry on that basis was 32 percent in the past five years, according to Bloomberg data.

“This is a heck of a premium” said Lee Simpson, an analyst at Jefferies International in London. Motorola Mobility’s patents are “a good counterweight if Apple comes after Google.”

Google agreed to pay Motorola Mobility $2.5 billion if the deal falls through, a person familiar with the matter said. Jennifer Erickson, a spokeswoman for Motorola Mobility, declined to comment on the breakup fee.

Android Rivals

The deal -- the largest wireless-equipment deal in at least a decade, according to data compiled by Bloomberg -- also makes Google a competitor to the other handset makers that use Android. In addition to phones made by Motorola Mobility, the software runs handsets made by companies such as Samsung Electronics Co. and HTC Corp. (2498)

“Google making an acquisition of one distinct player is going to put Samsung and HTC back on their heels and thinking, ‘Do we need to go forward with this platform?’” Simpson said. “‘Are there other platforms we can use?’ It might start to put Microsoft into focus as an alternative platform,” he said, referring to Microsoft Corp. (MSFT)’s Windows Mobile software.

Android, which Google gives away for free, will remain available to other manufacturers, the company said. Winston Yung, chief financial officer of HTC, gave his support to the deal, saying it will strengthen “the whole Android ecosystem.”

Google said Samsung and Android-phone manufacturers Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications AB and LG Electronics Inc. (066570) also support the transaction.

Microsoft rose 35 cents, or 1.4 percent, to $25.45 in early trading. Nokia Oyj (NOK1V), which plans to start making Windows phones, climbed 10 percent to 4.14 euros in Helsinki.

‘New Ground’

Android was the best-selling smartphone operating system in the second quarter as sales rose more than fourfold to 43.3 percent of the market, led by Samsung and HTC, according to research firm Gartner Inc. Apple had an 18.2 percent share, the researcher said. While Motorola Mobility’s Droid phones have found a following in the U.S., globally the company ranks outside the top players in the smartphone market.

“The combination of the two companies is going to create tremendous shareholder value, drive great user experiences and accelerate innovation,” Page said today on a conference call. “Motorola also has a strong patent portfolio, which will help protect Android from anticompetitive threats from Microsoft, Apple and other companies.”

End for Pioneer

The deal marks an end as an independent company for a company that helped pioneer mobile phones and introduced its first consumer handset in the early 1980s.

Motorola announced a plan to spin off its mobile-phone business in March 2008 amid market share losses and pressure from billionaire Icahn. The company then delayed the move amid the global recession before completing the split in January. Motorola Inc. became Motorola Solutions Inc., which makes radio equipment to emergency workers and scanning devices for retailers.

Last month, Icahn urged Motorola Mobility to explore alternatives for its patent portfolio after Nortel Networks Corp. sold wireless-technology intellectual property for $4.5 billion.

“This is a great outcome for all shareholders of Motorola Mobility, especially in light of today’s markets,” Icahn said today in a statement. “Motorola is activism at its best and we applaud management and the board for acting so responsibly.”

Since the January spinoff, Motorola Mobility shares have lost about a fifth of their value as the company has struggled to return to profitability and keep pace with larger rivals such as Samsung and Apple.

Qatalyst Partners advised Motorola and Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz LLP provided legal help. Lazard Ltd. advised Google and Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP was the legal counsel.

To contact the reporter on this story: Brian Womack in San Francisco at Bwomack1@bloomberg.net Zachary Tracer in New York at ztracer1@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Peter Elstrom at pelstrom@bloomberg.net; Tom Giles at tgiles5@bloomberg.net



To: Uncle Frank who wrote (2863)9/7/2011 11:19:50 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 2955
 
Essay: Jobs’s Departure as CEO of Apple Is the End of an Extraordinary Era

allthingsd.com



To: Uncle Frank who wrote (2863)9/22/2011 6:08:25 PM
From: stockman_scott1 Recommendation  Respond to of 2955
 
Voting to Hire a Chief Without Meeting Him

By JAMES B. STEWART
New York Times
September 23,, 2011

The mystery isn’t why Hewlett-Packard is likely to part ways with its chief executive, Léo Apotheker, after just a year in the job. It’s why he was hired in the first place.

The answer, say many involved in the process, lies squarely with the troubled Hewlett board. “It has got to be the worst board in the history of business,” Tom Perkins, a former H.P. director and a Silicon Valley legend, told me.

Interviews with several current and former directors and people close to them involved in the search that resulted in the hiring of Mr. Apotheker reveal a board that, while composed of many accomplished individuals, as a group was rife with animosities, suspicion, distrust, personal ambitions and jockeying for power that rendered it nearly dysfunctional.

Among their revelations: when the search committee of four directors narrowed the candidates to three finalists, no one else on the board was willing to interview them. And when the committee finally chose Mr. Apotheker and again suggested that other directors meet him, no one did. Remarkably, when the 12-member board voted to name Mr. Apotheker as the successor to the recently ousted chief executive, Mark Hurd, most board members had never met Mr. Apotheker.

“I admit it was highly unusual,” one board member who hadn’t met Mr. Apotheker told me. “But we were just too exhausted from all the infighting.” During Mr. Apotheker’s brief tenure, once-proud H.P. has become a laughingstock in Silicon Valley. Its results have weakened, its stock has plummeted and his strategy shifts have puzzled people inside and outside the company. Hewlett did not respond to an email seeking comment.

The immediate cause of dissension was the board’s decision in August 2010 to demand the resignation of Mr. Hurd, who had himself assumed the top position in the midst of board leaks and a phone pretexting scandal surrounding efforts to determine the source of the leaks that had laid bare irreconcilable differences among directors. He had replaced Carly Fiorina, who was also summarily ousted by the board.

Though not without detractors, Mr. Hurd pulled off one of the great rescue missions in American corporate history, refocusing the strife-ridden company and leading it to five years of revenue gains and a stock that soared 130 percent. Then came an incendiary letter from the activist lawyer Gloria Allred, charging that Mr. Hurd had sexually harassed a former soft-core pornography actress named Jodie Fisher, whom he had hired as a consultant for H.P. The accusations set off another fierce board battle.

The board named a committee headed by Robert L. Ryan, a former Medtronic executive and H.P.’s lead director, and Lucille Salhany, another director who was a former chairwoman of Fox Broadcasting, to investigate the accusations. An outside law firm did not find that that Mr. Hurd was guilty of the harassment charges but had submitted false expense reports in what seemed an effort to conceal the relationship. Mr. Hurd denied having an affair with Ms. Fisher (as he has since done publicly) and said his assistant had first contacted her after seeing her on a reality television program.

As one director told me, “We said, ‘Mark, just tell us the truth.’ He stuck to this story. He interviewed the woman twice, there was no search firm, no job posting, no discussion with anyone else. He met with her alone on more than one occasion. To be the hostess at a party? Give me a break.” Complicating matters was evidence H.P. obtained from Mr. Hurd’s office computer showing that he had viewed videos of Ms. Fisher.

Once some board members became convinced that Mr. Hurd had not been totally truthful, they insisted he had to be fired. Mr. Ryan convened a meeting to decide Mr. Hurd’s fate by saying that he wanted to give every director an opportunity to speak, but that he would begin.

“I don’t believe him,” he said bluntly, and noted that under H.P.’s employee guidelines, any other employee who lied to the board would be fired. He was strongly backed by Ms. Salhany.

Two other members, Joel Z. Hyatt, a media executive and founder of Hyatt Legal Plans, and John Joyce, a former private equity partner, were adamant that Mr. Hurd should stay, at least long enough to groom a successor and arrange for an orderly transition.

“They were very vocal about it,” said one director. “It’s healthy to have differing opinions, but this went too far. It became fractious. There were so many hard feelings. It became difficult to conduct business in a civil manner.”

Still grappling with Mr. Hurd’s messy departure (H.P. sued him after he joined the rival Oracle as its president, later dropping the case), the company began a search for his successor. Four directors — Lawrence Babbio, John Hammergren, Marc Andreessen and Mr. Hyatt — volunteered to form the search committee.

Some other directors were immediately distrustful. They suspected that some colleagues hoped to advance their own ambitions, including in at least one case to be the next chairman. Others were so angry over Mr. Hyatt’s support for Mr. Hurd that they declined to participate in any committee he was on.

Running H.P. might seem to be one of the best jobs in corporate America. But the committee quickly discovered that a company whose board had summarily fired its last two chief executives was a hard sell to top candidates, said people involved in the search.

Among those who rebuffed H.P., they said, was Virginia Rometty, a senior vice president at I.B.M. Ray Lane, a managing partner at Kleiner Perkins and a former president of Oracle, also rebuffed their approach but indicated he might be interested in being chairman.

According to directors, the committee narrowed the field to three candidates. Mr. Babbio favored an internal candidate. But before Mr. Hurd’s ouster, he had told the board that he did not feel anyone at H.P. was ready to assume the top job. Mr. Andreessen favored Scott McNealy, a co-founder and chief executive of Sun Microsystems.

Mr. McNealy was a candidate who worried other directors, given his outspoken personality and his track record at Sun Microsystems, whose stock had dropped precipitously with him at the helm. That left Mr. Apotheker, who had lasted just seven months as chief executive of the German software giant SAP. While reasonably well known in Europe and in software circles, he was relatively unknown in Silicon Valley.

As one executive said, “We had a joke: the code name for the search was Léo Apotheker. Because no one had heard of him.”

“Léo had a lot in his favor, and a lot of deficiencies,” said one board member. Everyone thought he was extremely smart and knew the global software business. Among the deficiencies may have been the circumstances under which he left SAP, but when I pressed various directors, no one seemed able to recall just what those were.

“I know there was a satisfactory explanation, and we did look into it,” one person told me. Others did not want to comment. (It has subsequently been reported that while Mr. Apotheker was at SAP, the German company was sued and admitted that it had infringed on Oracle software copyrights after stealing them. SAP has said he was not responsible for the part of the company where the theft occurred.)

Before a final vote on Mr. Apotheker, H.P. search committee members again urged other directors to meet him. No one took them up. At least one director, Ms. Salhany, tried to slow the process, worrying aloud that “no one has ever met him. Are we sure?” But her concerns were brushed aside. “Among the finalists, he was the best of a very unattractive group,” one director said.

However hasty the process, board members felt they had little choice. “I believe the search committee did a good job. They worked hard. There were very few choices,” one participant said. “ So many people they called said they weren’t interested. People didn’t want to follow in Mark’s footsteps. But Mr. Apotheker was a mistake. We all made it. Sometimes you make a mistake.”

Mr. Apotheker was named H.P.’s chief executive, with Ray Lane as chairman, almost exactly one year ago. Almost from the day Mr. Apotheker arrived, H.P.’s operating results declined with dizzying speed, climaxing a few weeks ago when H.P. announced that it might — or might not — sell or spin off its PC business, with its $30 billion in revenue and strong market share.

H.P. also said it was abandoning it its once-vaunted operating system and its much promoted new tablet computer. The unexpected announcements highlighted what critics say are Mr. Apotheker’s weaknesses: little experience in H.P.’s dominant hardware businesses, including printers and PCs; an inability to communicate effectively; and a tendency to make major decisions only in consultation with Mr. Lane, and not with H.P.’s managers.

“The company is coming apart at the seams,” said one person familiar with H.P.’s operations. “Because they may or may not be selling the PC business, the enterprise side is completely frozen. The business customers who buy tens of thousands of these machines along with support contracts are shutting them out. Dell and Lenovo are all over these accounts. They’re having a field day. H.P. is self-destructing.” A full-page ad in major newspapers trying to reassure PC customers did little to assuage doubts.

Whatever the board does now, ultimately it is going to need to examine itself.

How did it let things get to this? That, at the very least, should be the subject for inquiry by yet another committee.

nytimes.com



To: Uncle Frank who wrote (2863)9/22/2011 6:37:51 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 2955
 
The World According to Dell: From Hardware to Software and Now to the Cloud

By: Chris Preimesberger
2011-09-19
http://www.eweek.com/c/a/IT-Infrastructure/The-World-According-to-Dell-From-Hardware-to-Software-and-Now-to-the-Cloud-879010/?kc=EWKNLCLD09222011STR3

The Texas-based PC and server maker has expanded greatly into areas nobody would have considered five years ago—software, services and clouds—and Dell may have HP to thank for boosting its personal computing business.

ROUND ROCK, Texas -- Pre-med student Michael Dell started his computer-upgrading company at age 19 in his University of Texas dorm room in 1984. Twenty-seven years later, although he’s traded that little place in Austin for a tad-larger headquarters 20 miles up Highway 35 in Round Rock, his company has moved about a zillion miles from where it began.

With his design-it-yourself PCs in the 1980s and 1990s, Dell liberated personal computing in its own image, providing a cost-effective alternative to IBM PCs and Apple Macintoshes. In the mid-1990s, Dell moved into the enterprise: It developed its own PowerEdge servers, resold and serviced storage hardware from EMC, and made it all economically attractive for the company’s core group of customers—specifically, midrange and small businesses—to purchase and deploy the type of IT infrastructure they needed.

In 1992, at age 27, Dell became the youngest CEO to have his company ranked in the Fortune 500. In 1996, Dell started selling computers through the Internet, the same year his company launched its first servers. Since then, the business has zoomed to a 2011 market cap of $26.6 billion.

Respect Earned

Along the way, Michael Dell has earned the respect of many people in both the IT world and the larger global business community. Enterprise Strategy Group founder and chief analyst Steve Duplessie summed up what a lot of people in the business think and say about Dell: “Michael is a true one in a billion—one in $25 billion, to be more accurate.

“I can summarize the man easily. When we were talking about a bidding war that turned into billions [in 2010, Hewlett-Packard outbid Dell to buy 3PAR for $2.4 billion, a deal that many industry observers said was overpriced], Michael said: ‘I still spend my shareholders’ money as if it’s mine—as if it’s real money.’ And you know why? Because it is.

“To other mucky-mucks spending billions, it’s just numbers on a spreadsheet. Michael knows it’s real money. It was pretty profound. The guy is real.”

Now the company Dell built is briskly moving into new areas that don’t involve selling and maintaining hardware—something that would have been a completely foreign concept five years ago. It is winding down its storage reseller relationship with EMC and developing new-generation IPs with storage acquisitions: EqualLogic (bought in 2007) and Compellent (in 2010).

Dell also is averaging about two new software company acquisitions per quarter. Recent examples include application optimizer KACE, data management specialist Ocarina Networks, security provider SecureWorks and cloud infrastructure integrator Boomi.

“The computer industry started out as a hardware business, but customers now are showing more interest in solutions [preconfigured combinations of software, hardware and services] than they are in products,” Michael Dell told eWEEK in an interview at his office in Round Rock. “So that’s obviously where we’re headed.

“Look at the example of a large hospital. What they really don’t need is IT. What they want are better outcomes for their patients. That means they need all sorts of tools, like evidence-based medicine, health information systems, better accuracy of prescriptions, claims adjudication systems and affiliated physician systems.

“That’s what we do now. We want to provide all these tools in what people refer to as the cloud.”

Filling Out Product, Service Offerings

As a result of its acquisition activity in the last five years (since Dell returned to the CEO job in January 2007 after a three-year hiatus as board chairman, replacing Kevin Rollins), the company is moving into providing cloud systems and cloud services in a big way. Put it all together, and Dell is quickly approaching the rarified air occupied by such venerable all-purpose IT companies as IBM, Hewlett-Packard (HP) and Oracle.

“When Michael returned to take back the CEO job in 2007, the company was struggling and hadn’t changed its business model,” said Charles King, an analyst with Pund-IT Research. “Back in 2007, change was in the air; there was a strong sense that the old model of pursuing only the business of low-margin, industry-standard products for their own sake was not going to continue to be as profitable as in the past.”

Since returning and moving his company away from its image as a maker of low-cost PCs, Dell has sought out strategic acquisitions that the company can spin into new profit centers.

“The kinds of companies we like to acquire are proven, but sort of unknown,” Dell said. “We’ll acquire about eight companies a year, and Dave Johnson [Dell senior vice president and chief of acquisitions] will have to look at about 250.

“The best companies are those we are already partnering with because we understand them and they understand us. We de-risk a lot of the acquisitions because we already know what we’re doing.”

EqualLogic, a new-generation storage company whose arrays and software fit right into the cloud-computing model, is a good example of what Dell does with its acquisitions: namely, magnifying their value into its 180-country sales network, and providing capital and personnel where required.

“When we bought EqualLogic [in 2007], they had about 3,000 customers; now they’re well over 30,000 customers,” Dell said. “We’ve had KACE for seven quarters; their business is now seven times larger than what it was before the deal.

“I don’t know if we can keep doing that—eight quarters/eight times bigger, nine quarters/nine times bigger—but we’ll certainly find out if we can.”

Dell’s Take on HP

During the interview, Dell was in an ebullient mood, which was understandable. A week earlier, his company’s biggest competitor in the personal systems business, HP, had announced its plans to leave the business entirely to focus more of its energies on software and services. (According to industry analysts Gartner and IHS iSuppli, HP is the No. 1 PC maker in the world, with about 17 percent of the market; Dell has 12 percent.)

Dell, a user of Twitter, chided HP that day with this tweet: “If HP spins off their PC business ... maybe they will call it Compaq?” He was referring to HP’s controversial 2002 acquisition of that PC company.

“What an opportunity for us, no question about it,” Dell said. “While we are moving into software and services, we are going to continue to grow our PC businesses, as we know we can.

“Remember, this [global IT] is a $3 trillion business, and we think there are fabulous opportunities all through it. People are going to continue to use PCs [in various forms] for a long time to come, even though there are a lot of other good new devices out there.

“I know a lot of good people at HP, and you don’t ever want to wish anybody ill. HP has been a very successful company for a long time. But they do seem to be having a tough go right now. Businesswise, of course, it’s very good for Dell and our shareholders. So you have to look at it first from that standpoint.”

Dell is also in the emerging device businesses, with its Windows- and Android-based Streak tablets and Venue smartphones—another business HP is dropping. The holes in those markets formerly occupied by HP are creating a great opportunity for Dell to step right in and improve its sales in North America.

Dell sells most of its portable connected devices in the Far East and has quite a way to go to catch up to Apple and Samsung, the two world market leaders.

Those prospects—together with new business opening up in the cloud services and infrastructure markets—indicate that things are looking up for Dell.

“Last quarter, we had $1 billion in new [service contract] signings, which is a record for the company,” Dell said, “and we have $15 billion or $16 billion in deferred services revenue. If you compare that to about three years ago, the number was about $5.5 billion. We’ve almost tripled the forward calendar of services activity. It’s a substantial business.”

New Moves Into Cloud Services

Dell made major cloud-related announcements at both VMworld 2011 in Las Vegas and Dreamforce in San Francisco. On Aug. 29 at VMworld, the company revealed that it will launch its first public cloud offering later this year as part of its partnership with VMware.

Dell will host VMware’s new vCloud public cloud systems in Dell data centers: One is already online in Plano, Texas, and the other is under construction in the Pacific Northwest. More data centers are being planned.

“This partnership also will build private clouds for customers,” said Mark Bilger, vice president and CTO of Dell Services. “By extension between the two, Dell Services will be providing hyper-cloud solutions between the private cloud data centers and Dell’s public cloud offering.”

So Dell and VMware are connecting a lot of dots: customers to the cloud, data centers to data centers, and data centers to outside public cloud services. There is no question that this is a full cloud-service offering with many options for customers to consider.

This will be a multitenant environment for running virtual systems. It will provide access to virtual CPUs, memory, storage networks, IP addresses, firewalls and catalog capabilities.

Despite its successes, Dell isn’t all the way back to where some industry analysts think it should be. The stock price has been hovering in the $15 range for about two years; in late 2007, it was double that price.

In 2009, during the height of the U.S. macroeconomic crisis, the company saw its revenues drop 16 percent in one quarter and was forced to cut expenses back by $3 billion and lay off about 2,000 workers in the PC division. Dell’s most recent quarterly earnings report (Q2 2011) came in under Wall Street expectations and showed only modest gains, with revenue up a mere 1 percent over last year, totaling $15.66 billion.

Company Needs to Take Advantage of All Opportunities

So it behooves Dell & Co. to make good on all of its markets—especially those being vacated by a large competitor such as HP.

Peter Levine, a general partner at venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz, has known and worked with Michael Dell in various relationships over “many, many years.” Prior to moving into venture capital, Levine ran the data center and cloud group at Citrix, which he joined in 2007 after serving as CEO at XenSource. Previously, he was an executive at storage and security provider Veritas, which was bought by Symantec for $10 billion in 2005.

Levine said that more hardware companies are turning their focus on software infrastructure—similar to what Dell is now doing.

“I’ve seen them go through the evolution from being a PC/server vendor to being a full-service organization,” Levine said. “The move to cloud computing—and the emphasis on software and building out a software/hardware solution stack around cloud computing—is an interesting and innovative approach for the company. They’re taking their hardware and service assets, coupling that with software assets, and moving toward the cloud computing infrastructure space.

“Michael Dell is a visionary leader who’s succeeded in the last couple of years to increase the value of the company from a customer perspective,” Levine said. “That’s ultimately how these things get measured. Their acquisitions in the service space have made them more comprehensive.”

Nevertheless, Levine doesn’t believe the company is completely out of the woods yet.

“There is a subtle difference between what I and other people might think of Michael Dell versus Dell as a company,” Levine said. “Dell as a company, to me, still feels like a hardware company. I know they’re rapidly changing that to increase their service offerings. Ultimately, I think it’s going to come down to software, which is going to make a huge difference in their overall ability to deliver all these new capabilities.

“I think they’re on a great path to get there. I think Michael’s a visionary leader for the company—that’s why he came back—and we can see a lot of things in process. Their next move, providing cloud infrastructure and hosting applications as a service, is a smart one.”

Seeing a Changing Market

Pund-IT analyst King believes Michael Dell has learned some valuable lessons from other companies about what to do—and what not to do—in order to grow Dell’s core business and expand into new areas.

“HP is a great example of this,” King said. “It did $41 billion in the PC business last year at a 5 percent margin. Basically, a third of their business produced about 15 percent of their profits.

“What [Michael] Dell did was look around to see what other CEOs have done—especially [Samuel] Palmisano at IBM, who has moved quickly and aggressively to a software-and service-driven business, using software as a differentiator for their hardware.

“Dell will continue in the PC business and will find plenty of buyers. [Michael] Dell’s kept his eye on the prize: the cloud and all the software and services that go with it.

“They’re selling into nine of the top 10 Web services providers in the world, and they were the first vendor to create a hyper-scale cloud computing unit to focus specifically on those data centers. Dell may be underestimated by some people. That would be a mistake.”



To: Uncle Frank who wrote (2863)9/23/2011 1:31:09 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 2955
 
To HP's New CEO: Keep PCs And Focus On Consumerization Of IT To Best Serve The Enterprise Customer

http://www.forbes.com/sites/forrester/2011/09/23/to-hps-new-ceo-keep-pcs-and-focus-on-consumerization-of-it-to-best-serve-the-enterprise-customer/



To: Uncle Frank who wrote (2863)10/5/2011 8:24:09 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2955
 
Steve Jobs, Apple founder, dies

http://edition.cnn.com/2011/10/05/us/obit-steve-jobs/?hpt=T1