SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : President Barack Obama -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ChinuSFO who wrote (99659)8/16/2011 11:56:47 AM
From: zeta1961  Respond to of 149317
 
GOP Still Has No Chance

So far, the GOP is not constructing a candidate who can prosper in the states in which the 2012 election will turn. And the two major candidates, Romney and Perry, fail to deliver outside their own narrow, predictable records. Romney’s governorship in deeply blue Massachusetts is a waste and provides no momentum in the heartland, especially given his role in leveraged buyouts that helped transfer America’s manufacturing jobs to Asia. Perry’s governorship in red Texas is equally a waste, as the GOP hardly needs a hog-calling country parson lite from West Texas to carry the Old South. How does Perry go North with the shopworn baggage of Johnny Reb superiority and an unapologetic evangelical paternalism?

thedailybeast.com

The GOP wags who watched the fisticuffs in the Iowa straw poll with an eye on the Electoral College in the November 2012 election can do the math, following the swoon of Tim Pawlenty and the surge of Michele Bachmann. And they don’t like what they see.

The goal is not to be the man or woman who charms the Iowa caucuses and the New Hampshire primary electorate next year. The goal is to defeat the potent, lavishly financed incumbent, Barack Obama.

The strongest Republican Electoral College path to victory is to attract the hefty young Catholic male vote in the Rust Belt—Pennsylvania, Ohio, Indiana, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Minnesota (home to both Pawlenty and Bachmann). The winning candidate will also have to hold on to enough of the young female Catholic vote in the Rust Belt, as well as in North Carolina, Virginia, and West Virginia, to help keep the default Democratic lead among female voters below 14 percent.

The Republicans’ best hope, on paper, then, would be to choose a young, Catholic candidate out of the Rust Belt, and that describes Rick Santorum, 53, of Pennsylvania or Thaddeus McCotter, 45, of Michigan. Yet neither of them is anywhere close to the top tier of the field.

In truth, the results of the Ames Straw Poll are decidedly unpromising for the Rust Belt on Election Day, a mere 15 months away.

Mitt Romney, 64, is a much older plutocrat from no particular place other than luxury—Massachusetts? New Hampshire? Michigan? Nevada? California?—with a fortune of at least $250 million and a long record of hedging policy issues that are fundamental to the GOP in the 21st century, such as taxes, health care, and manufacturing growth. The best indication of Romney’s troubles so far is the joke going around that the reason he speculated so early on a running mate like Chris Christie of New Jersey or Marco Rubio of Florida is that he's sensitive to the need for a Republican on his ticket.

With only five months until the first January sounding, the GOP is feeling an undeserved cockiness.


2012 GOP candidates Michele Bachmann, Rick Perry, and Mitt Romney, From left: David Peterson, CBS News / AP Photos; Evan Vucci / AP Photos; Jim Cole / AP Photos

Rick Perry, 61, of Texas is also older; he is also a fervent evangelical Christianwith little sense of proportion about his associations. Just prior to announcing his candidacy in South Carolina on Saturday, Perry joined with the American Family Association (AFA) in a tent revival so large it was called “Prayerapalooza” and required Houston’s Reliant Stadium. What surprises here is that Perry knows full well that the AFA is called a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center for its bizarre intolerance toward homosexuals and other minorities. In his rise to the governorship, Perry also did not repudiate the praise of extremely separatist groups such as the League of the South and the Sons of Confederate Veterans. Can a man who uses cheap talk about secessionism do well campaigning up North, in places like Philadelphia, Cleveland, and Detroit?

Bachmann, 55, enjoyed success in Ames largely on the basis of the fact that she is a native of Waterloo, Iowa. Left unanswered for another day is the peculiar fact that she worshiped at an evangelical Lutheran church in Minnesota that boasts of its anti-Catholic prejudices. Bachmann has many strengths as a colorful campaigner, but little of her rhetoric so far will give her an advantage in the cautious parishes of the Rust Belt.

The remainder of the Republican field does little to help the GOP’s Electoral College calculus against the president.

Newt Gingrich, 68, called “Fat Elvis” by House members, is older and not much interested in more than performing a toneless soliloquy about himself. Ron Paul, 72, is much older, and not much engaged in more than libertarian fustiness; he also seems to pale beside his vivacious son, Sen. Rand Paul. Herman Cain, 66, is at best a dabbler in GOP policy, a talk-show provocateur in his element with a hot mike before a righteous crowd. Gary Johnson, 58, former governor of New Mexico, is another quiet libertarian who offers little to ponder and prefers extreme sports to campaigning. Finally, Jon Huntsman Jr., 51, when he isn’t being a cipher, is mostly a mini-me of Romney, with the distinction that Huntsman’s father is a stealthy plutocrat who seems to act through his son like a puppeteer.

So far, the GOP is not constructing a candidate who can prosper in the states in which the 2012 election will turn. And the two major candidates, Romney and Perry, fail to deliver outside their own narrow, predictable records. Romney’s governorship in deeply blue Massachusetts is a waste and provides no momentum in the heartland, especially given his role in leveraged buyouts that helped transfer America’s manufacturing jobs to Asia. Perry’s governorship in red Texas is equally a waste, as the GOP hardly needs a hog-calling country parson lite from West Texas to carry the Old South. How does Perry go North with the shopworn baggage of Johnny Reb superiority and an unapologetic evangelical paternalism? There are other, more difficult roads to the 270 electoral votes needed for victory, and the party could still find its way there. But for the moment, with only five months until the first January sounding, the GOP is feeling an undeserved cockiness, and the Obama reelection campaign is showing an unwarranted nervousness.



To: ChinuSFO who wrote (99659)8/16/2011 12:55:12 PM
From: bentway  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 149317
 
I'm HOPING Perry's a little too crazy and Bush-like for center right America. If he were elected, we could for SURE count on some more wars.



To: ChinuSFO who wrote (99659)8/16/2011 1:53:53 PM
From: tejek  Respond to of 149317
 
You've got to love Gingrich.........playing the part of the absent minded professor adds a little levity....and truth..........to the election season. I hope he stays in it.

Gingrich forgets GOP line on payroll taxes


As far as GOP presidential hopeful Newt Gingrich is concerned, congressional Republicans are probably going to have to give in and extend President Obama’s payroll tax break.

“I think it’s very hard not to keep the payroll tax cut in this economy,” Gingrich said in a presentation at the conservative Heritage Foundation. “I don’t know what Republicans are going to say but I think it’s very hard to say ‘no.’ We’re going to end up in a position where we’re gonna raise taxes on the lowest income Americans the day they go to work and make life harder for small businesses.” He’s referring to a stimulative, two percent payroll tax holiday President Obama negotiated when he agreed to extend the Bush tax cuts in December. It’s set to expire at the end of the year, and it’s one of the economic growth proposals President Obama has called on Congress to pass when they return from August recess.

“I do think that it’s a serious challenge to not extend it,” Gingrich added.

Quick follow-up question for Newt: have you actually met any congressional Republicans lately?

Gingrich appears to be analyzing this situation in terms of what makes sense, and in general, that’s a perspective I enjoy. But some GOP leaders have already announced their opposition to Obama’s request for an extension of the tax break.

Republicans are going to find “it’s very hard to say ‘no’”? Actually, House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R-Wis.), just last week, found it very easy to say no, telling Fox News a payroll tax cut extension “would simply exacerbate our debt problems.” House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Dave Camp (R-Wis.) has said of the idea, “I’m not in favor of that. I don’t think that’s a good idea.” A month ago, during the debt-ceiling negotiations, President Obama tried to incorporate the payroll break into the deal, and GOP leaders rejected it then, too.

Keep in mind, the payroll tax break has been, traditionally, a Republican idea. But now that President Obama is championing the idea, the same GOP officials who pushed for this tax cut are now opposed to their own measure.

As Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) recently argued, “If they oppose even something so suited to their tastes ideologically, it shows that they’re just opposing anything that helps create jobs. It almost makes you wonder if they aren’t trying to slow down the economic recovery for political gain.”

This is the whole point of the “sabotage” question. The argument isn’t that Republicans have conservative ideas about helping the economy. Questioning their motivations on this alone would be foolish. The point, rather, is that Republicans have begun rejecting their own ideas about helping the economy.

In the larger context, it’s possible House Republican leaders, in their heart of hearts, actually support an extension of the payroll tax cut, but just aren’t willing to say so. Why not? Because then they lose leverage — GOP officials know the White House wants this, and if they simply agree to pass the measure, they won’t get anything extra out of the deal.

It’s likely, then, that congressional Republicans will simply hold the payroll tax cut hostage, and demand other goodies from Democrats in exchange for doing what the GOP wants to do anyway. If Dems give in, Republicans get more of what they want. If Dems don’t, Republicans will blame Dems for raising middle-class taxes, even if it’s obviously the GOP’s fault.

And what kind of ransom would Republicans expect for this? Apparently, they want a tax break for repatriating overseas corporate funds, which didn’t work when it was tried seven years ago, which is fundamentally regressive, and which would worsen the deficit the GOP pretends to care about.

The 2010 midterms continue to look like the biggest mistake Americans have made in a long while.