Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: t4texas who wrote (441439)	8/19/2011 4:57:48 PM
From: Neeka	6 Recommendations Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793955

I just watched it, and Rangel did everything in his power to skirt the questions, and Laura wasn't going to let him get away with the same old techniques that have been used by him and his ilk since forever. He was obviously uncomfortable with such bold and frankly courageous questions on the part of the "pretty girl." Rangel fell back on the tired tactic of blaming everyone else...........especially republicans (he must have said "republicans" or "they" 30 times.........instead of actually answering a straight question. Lauran Ingram deserves a medal.

To: t4texas who wrote (441439)	8/19/2011 9:58:53 PM
From: ManyMoose	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793955

I don't like moderators who interrupt excessively. O'Reilly is like that and I often find myself wishing he would shut up. In Laura's case, I think she interrupted Rangel only because he was trying to evade the question. If she'd let him continue, he would have gone off on a tangent. He and Obama are notorious for that. They talk so much they suck up all the time and the really hard questions don't even get asked. Laura Ingraham did not let that happen.