Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: goldworldnet who wrote (441951)	8/22/2011 8:58:04 AM
From: DMaA	2 Recommendations Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793782

calling it a scientific theory that has not been proven. That's not an effective approach. Lord Monckton grants them their premise for the sake of discussion - that it's going to get warmer and we are causing it. Then demolishes their "solution" by pointing out it will only prevent a fraction of a degree of warming and cost untold trillions. The warmers are force to accept that since he uses their own numbers. And the cost of slamming our CO2 production back to depression era levels will be much much more than the worst case costs of global warming. That from scientific analysis published in peer reviews journals. Saying "the scientific theory that has not been proven" is exactly the tobacco companies argument and look where that got them. .