Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : QUANTUM -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Emile Vidrine who wrote (5112)	11/18/1997 4:16:00 PM
From: Dale J.	Respond to of 9124

Emile thats a good point. But the bears(Sellers) / bulls(Buyers) exchanged qntm at a lower price. In other words the bears seemed to have the upper hand. But I not losing confidence in qntm. I'm just pondering some questions. I feel some pressure, but I'm not about to panic. I just like to hear some points of view such as yours, on the selloff. I think we are just testing the bottom again. Dale

To: Emile Vidrine who wrote (5112)	11/18/1997 4:19:00 PM
From: Rational	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 9124

The largest block size was ~100,000 shares. Most sizes were small. There was a panic sale at the end, considering the small trade sizes. Thus, there were more institutions buying than selling, IMO. This means big money got in while small money got out, on average. This could be because many small players knew of QNTM and got early in before the WS discovered and chose to get out due to WDC's problems today and general negative sentiments about the market while the more big institutions got in. This is my guess based on tick sizes and prices. Sankar