Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: abuelita who wrote (78214)	8/22/2011 4:10:38 PM
From: Cogito Ergo Sum	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217910

You have a service that makes you appear (your IP address) to be in US ?.. I'm getting the annoying go to Comedy Network spiel ... will check it later.. off to osteopath presently with my little snow rocket..

To: abuelita who wrote (78214)	8/22/2011 5:28:40 PM
From: Maurice Winn	1 Recommendation Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 217910

Rose, Jon deceived you into thinking those so-called "poor" people don't have anything. They have huge revenue from their jobs, but spend it all, much of it on booze, smokes and so-called "food" which makes them obese. If they were taxed, they would not be able to damage their health so much. It would be a kindness to them to take their money from them so that we rich would not have to pay so much to the government, leaving us with more money for our noble investments in things like noble metals, which creates jobs for the so-called "poor" people. Tax on those "poor" is a kindness. I was once upon a time one of those "poor" people and in fact I was rich beyond belief because I had no responsibilities. Having assets or so-called "wealth" is a terrible burden, because it has to be carefully nurtured lest it come to harm and the "poor" people who work to maintain those assets would lose their jobs and revenue. It would be so much easier to just be poor again. Those lazy "poor" people can't be bothered taking on such noble work. They just enjoy life without responsibility. Best of all was being poor and also having no revenue, living on charity, because then I didn't even have to work in the dirty, noisy, arduous jobs I had when "poor". When poor with no revenue, I'd spend days at the beach with girlfriends. Life was good. Mqurice