SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: steve harris who wrote (625782)8/25/2011 10:16:19 AM
From: joseffy1 Recommendation  Respond to of 1572750
 
Idiot Supports Black Flash Mobs
......................................................................................................
Young Black Men, and The Power of Flash Mobs!!

June 13, 2011 By Phillip Jackson
http://thyblackman.com/2011/06/13/young-black-men-and-the-power-of-flash-mobs/comment-page-2/

(ThyBlackMan.com) We cannot police hopelessness and despair!

There are those who are angered and surprised by the violence of urban “Flash Mobs” (quickly forming groups of young people using technology to organize), especially crowds of young Black men, descending on mostly White, affluent downtown American cities. However, if we analyze this phenomenon, it is not so surprising. In fact, it is highly predictable. While there is no justification for young Black men to rob and beat people of any race, the activities of flash mobs are easily understandable in the context of recent social history and current economic conditions.

Most of these young men are poor, desperate and hopeless. They come from broken families and broken communities. They hav e been failed by their schools and by social and faith organizations in their communities. They don’t have jobs and many of them will never have jobs. They live at the bottom rung of society. The kind of havoc they wreak among us through “flash mobbing” is the kind of havoc they have lived with their entire young lives. For them, there is a perverse kind of justice and sense of fairness in their ability to create flash mobs that breathe terror into the hearts of other Americans.

Predictive factors for young Black males participating in the activities of violent flash mobs in Chicago are shown by recent data:

This summer, 90% of young Black men in Chicago between 16 and 19 years old are unemployed. Only 44% of Black males graduate with a high school diploma from Chicago public schools. Only three out of 100 Black boys who start kindergarten in the Chicago Public Schools earn a bachelors degree by age 25. 70% of Black children in America are born into and live in single, female-headed households that are usually impoverished. Black males are 6% of Illinois’ population but they represent 60% of the state’s prison population.


    The power and strength of a flash mob are in its large number of congregants and in its ability to assemble quickly and to disband equally as fast. The word “flash” is an allusion to social media — texting, smart phones Twitter and Facebook. Flash media, an effective tool for organizing a social cause, is the same media that brought down the government of Egypt. Now inner-city youth are using this same media, but instead of toppling governments, they “topple” Macy’s, Neiman Marcus and Old Navy, and they steal IPads and IPhones from defenseless citizens.

    The message from the flash mob to us is even more threatening than the mob itself. That message is, “You can’t control us! You don’t scare us! Your police don’t scare us! Your prisons don’t scare us! We are mightier than you! We will take what you have because you have given us few other options in life for earning similar things. And most importantly, we will take your peace of mind. Just as we in our communities cannot ever feel secure, now neither can you! We are more afraid of continuing to live our lives as they are than we are of you locking us up. What do we have to lose? For once, we are more powerful than you!”

    Flash mobs are not new. In Black communities across America for the past 30 years, large groups of Black males have attacked others. In the past few years, jobless, desperate, hopeless youth have rioted in France, Greece, Belgium, Sweden, Denmark, Tunisia, and Egypt in efforts eerily similar to America’s flash mobs, but on a much larger scale and with politically clear motives and demands. These youth have taken over business districts, cities and countries and they have destroyed billions of dollars in property while toppling governments. The same root causes for these youth riots and disturbances in Europe and Northern Africa are producing similar actions, and possibly similar politically conscious attitudes, in the youth of Chicago, New York City, Charlotte, Baltimore, Boston, Philadelphia and other American cities.

    Politicians and the police are working under the false and dangerous assumption that hopelessness and despair can be policed. The police are out-numbered and out-maneuvered in this battle of minds, spirits, bodies and technology. Even as thirty-three flash mobbers were arrested in Chicago this past week, the communities in Chicago were producing a thousand more potential flash mobbers to replace them. When Black boys are not reading at grade level by the third grade, we are creating conditions for a flash mob. When Black teenagers cannot find meaningful work, we are creating conditions for a flash mob. When young Black boys do not have suitable role models and mentors, we are creating conditions for a flash mob.

    The best way to deter a violent flash mob is to stop it from forming. The best time to stop it from forming is when the potential congregants are 2 and 3 years old, not when they are 16, 20 and 30 years old. The best weapons against flash mobs are jobs, not police with guns; education, not incarceration; and positive guidance and direction, not threats or curses. Can flash mobs be stopped? Absolutely. Is America working properly to stop them? Absolutely not.

    Welcome to the year 2011 where ethics, sociology, economics, criminology, politics and technology cross! The flash mobbers are trying to tell us, “You can’t stop us, but with your help, we can stop ourselves!”

    Written By Phillip Jackson

    Founder and Executive Director

    The Black Star Project
    3509 South King Drive
    Chicago, Illinois 60653
    773.285.9600 office
    312.771.1010 cell
    Blackstar1000@ameritech.net



    To: steve harris who wrote (625782)8/25/2011 11:21:48 AM
    From: joseffy  Respond to of 1572750
     
    Gov. Deval Patrick ignores real victims

    By Michael Graham Thursday, August 25, 2011 -
    http://www.bostonherald.com/news/opinion/op_ed/view/2011_0825gov_ignores_real_victims/

    And still Gov. Deval Patrick says “no.”

    Even after the horror from Milford, Patrick says “no.”

    After hearing how a 23-year-old young man named Matthew Denice screamed in anguish as his body was ripped apart beneath a truck; how the victim was still alive when an illegal immigrant driver allegedly backed over him as he fled the police; how the accused killer, Nicolas Guaman, merely shrugged at the police after being arrested.

    Even after all this, Patrick rejects Secure Communities. He still believes that when Guaman was arrested in 2008 for assault, breaking and entering, and resisting arrest, Massachusetts did the right thing by not handing him over to immigration authorities. By releasing him back onto the streets of Milford, where he could continue to be a threat to his neighbors.

    Why? What can Massachusetts possibly gain that is worth the future of this recent Framingham State grad killed — “murdered,” according to his stepfather, Mike — allegedly by an illegal immigrant? What possible benefit can come from giving special protection to law-breaking immigrants that is as valuable as this lost American life?

    Patrick has no answer. So while he vacations in the Berkshires, he sends out his flaks to read a cold, sterile statement denying there’s any problem at all.

    “The governor’s policy is that serious criminals who are here illegally should be deported,” the statement said.

    What the statement doesn’t say is that Patrick would refuse to allow Massachusetts to send Guaman’s fingerprints to Immigration and Customs Enforcement the first time they arrested him, or the many times Milford cops arrested, detained or answered calls to his apartment afterwards.

    As Matt’s stepfather said on my radio show Monday, “If Guaman was deported some time ago, this would never have happened.”

    “Some time ago.” Perhaps last month. That’s when Patrick was in Milford for a town-hall-style forum. Angry locals confronted him with signs, like “When will you secure OUR community?” They begged him then to end this ridiculous policy, told him of residents killed by illegal immigrants in the recent past.

    What did Patrick tell them?

    “We don’t need Secure Communities.” All it does is “give the impression that we are doing something.”

    I wonder if Patrick would be willing to go back today and tell Matt’s parents that, even after the loss of their son, we still don’t need it.

    The most disturbing part of this story is that it is so common. A year ago I wrote a column about a 4-year-old Springfield girl raped by an illegal immigrant enjoying sanctuary. The very same weekend Matt Denice died in Milford, a 4-year-old California boy was crushed to death during a hit-and-run by an illegal immigrant with two previous arrests.

    Matthew Denice died because of politics. Shameless, blatant, special-interest politics. Take away the politics of Beacon Hill Democrats sucking up to a key constituency, and this becomes a non-issue.

    What could be less political than “enforce the law equally for everyone?”

    But choosing to ignore the law and block its enforcement? Now that’s all about politics.

    It also gets people killed.

    And Patrick reminds us yet again which Massachusetts Democrats find more important.



    To: steve harris who wrote (625782)8/27/2011 4:44:17 PM
    From: Taro  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1572750
     
    Steve, if your truly believe that the Hiroshima bomb was ignored, then I do have a rubber cell ready for you, OK? Showing some consideration for your strong performance in the 'Picks of The Quarter' competition this time, however, that would be a rubber cell with caviar and champagne facilities :)

    Seriously, I doubt the Japanese were given much time to come up with a Hirohito reaction to the first (U235) bomb. Also, it may have been important to check the action of the 2nd (Plutonium) bomb vs, the first, thus Nagasaki.

    That is indeed a great argument, probably the best of any around so far.

    /Taro