SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Semi Equipment Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kirk © who wrote (53451)8/27/2011 9:14:42 PM
From: Donald Wennerstrom2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 95521
 
Kirk, You wrote the post to me complaining about the compensation deal for Tim Cook. I have been searching for a way to answer you that will offend the least amount of people. Compensation is, and always has been, and always will be, a touchy subject that tends to get people upset, because for the most part people feel that top executives are paid way to much in stock, bonuses and salary. My personal opinion is that many are overpaid, but I don't want to cover the waterfront here because there are literally hundreds of thousands of different situations, and each one would have a different solution.

But let's look at the situation of Tim Cook. I am going to try to keep this light with a little humour so we don't keep a discussion of his compensation going on forever.

According to the article you posted, his compensation is "1 million shares of company stock worth a whopping $384 million that vests over 10 years." I checked with Yahoo today and AAPL's market cap is listed at 355B. So lets round Tim's compensation off 355M which is 0.1 percent of the market cap. That means that if you presently own 1,000,000 dollars of AAPL stock, you will be paying him 100 dollars a year for 10 years to manage the company. If he is up to the job, that is a very small price to pay. Of course who knows if he is up to the job? If you own the stock you certainly hope so, or your 1M dollars of stock will take a hit of unknown value.

One thing I do not think, in general, that the amount of compensation has anything to do with how hard Tim will work in his job, or any other high paid executive for that matter. At that level of responsibility, I would be much more worried about "burnout" than working too hard. At the CEO level in any company it is almost always about "vision" more than any other attribute. I looked up Tim Cook on Google

en.wikipedia.org

Here is one of the items there that has to do with his work ethic.

<<He regularly begins sending emails at 4:30 am and used to hold Sunday night staff meetings by telephone to prepare for the next week.>>

Getting back to the IBD article on AAPL. AAPL is a national treasure, and a true measure of what makes America great. I hope we will be as supportive of the entrepreneurial spirt in the future as we have in the past to allow development of future AAPLs.



To: Kirk © who wrote (53451)8/27/2011 9:21:47 PM
From: Jacob Snyder1 Recommendation  Respond to of 95521
 
AAPL is a great company, and has been a great stock in recent years. But, like QCOM, and a long list of other companies, it isn't run for the benefit of shareholders. If it was, that money would have gone to dividends, and the new CEO should have gotten the same kind of shares available to the public (not options, and not "special" shares), with the same downside risks I take if I own AAPL.