Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: goldworldnet who wrote (442911)	8/27/2011 9:16:18 PM
From: joseffy	6 Recommendations Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793800

Hilarious. ERIC HOLDER was the eager stooge used by Reno and Clinton to do their dirtiest work. The WACO slaughter The Clinton pardons in Clinton's last hours in office, including the Mark Rich pardon and the Puerto Rican terrorists pardoning, were signed off on by Holder. Holder should be prosecuted for what he did under Clinton/Reno. Yet they approved him as full Attorney General after all of that. The first thing he did as Obama's AG was to drop the New Black Panther's voting intimidation case. The next was to put the Guantanamo trials in civilian court. He and Obama are sweating now over the Gunrunner scandal google.com and ordering everyone involved not to testify to Congress, just as they did with the New Black Panthers situation. washingtonpost.com foxnews.com youtube.com pajamasmedia.com foxnews.com Bartle Bull, a longtime civil rights activist, entered an affidavit, saying: Their clear purpose and intent was to intimidate voters with whom they did not agree. Their views were, in part, made apparent by the uniform of the organization the two men wore and the racially-charged statements they made. For example, I heard the shorter man [King Samir Shavazz] make a statement directed toward white poll observers that,... ‘you are about to be ruled by a black man, cracker.’ To me, the presence and behavior of the two uniformed men was an outrageous affront to American democracy and the rights of voters to participate in elections without fear. It would qualify as the most blatant form of voter intimidation I have encountered in my life in political campaigns in many states, even going back to the work I did in Mississippi in the 1960s.” maggiesnotebook.blogspot.com